[Bridging_the_digital_divide] Taking tests on computers - how about
the special needs?
Jason Barkeloo
jbarkeloo at touchsmart.net
Tue Jun 15 12:44:10 EDT 2004
State may issue tests on school computers
By CLAUDETTE RILEY
Staff Writer
All public students could be participating by 2010
If Tennessee can work out the kinks, all public school students will be
taking their mandatory exams on computer by 2010.
State education officials plan to try out select online end-of-course
exams in about 10 districts during the next school year, make
adjustments and then phase in other tests — and districts — statewide.
The state hasn't picked the pilot districts.
Schools would probably use computerized testing for the state-mandated
reading, language arts, science, math and social studies exams given to
students in grades 3–8; end-of-course exams given in high school; and
the Gateway Algebra I, biology and English II exams that students must
pass to get a diploma.
''Four or five years from now, we'd like to have all our assessments
online,'' said Keith Brewer, deputy commissioner of education. ''It's a
vision we hope to cultivate and make a reality.''
Advocates of the change say it would save taxpayer money, reduce
testing time, allow students to take tests closer to the end of the
school year, speed up test results and give schools more time to help
struggling students catch up to their peers.
''I'd love to see this happen. This is the future,'' said Paul Changas,
student assessment coordinator for Metro schools. ''We could use it to
more quickly determine what's happening in the classroom and the
school. Right now, there's a lot of lost time.''
For the change to become a reality, state officials said, the system
must be secure and each of the state's 136 school systems must have the
technology needed to support computerized testing.
''We'd have to make sure there is no security breach,'' Brewer said.
Teachers would still be used to monitor testing, he said, and several
versions of the tests might be given at one time.
A statewide survey is planned to find out which districts have the
right computer equipment and which need help getting up to par.
''Once we know how much we've got, we'll start to brainstorm on how to
partner with districts to put money toward that,'' Brewer said.
''You'll have some districts out there good to go.''
Officials said they would like to have one fully equipped computer
laboratory in every school but might consider having a tiny district or
several small schools share a common location.
Alfred Boyter, co-chairman of the Robertson County School Board, said
using computers ''would be fantastic.''
''It would be a good use of our resources, it would bring technology
into the classroom and save our taxpayers money.''
Boyter said quicker test results would also help schools get struggling
students into tutoring or other remedial programs earlier than usual.
''You are hitting the target immediately instead of waiting eight
months or even a year later,'' he said.
Officials said some schools might elect to use computers for other
exams that aren't administered statewide.
But educators concede that some students, particularly those with
special needs, may never be able to take all their exams on a computer.
''There will probably have to be a small number of paper-and-pencil
options,'' Changas said.
Other testing changes
As Tennessee education officials consider giving mandatory exams on
computer, these other testing changes are being studied or have been
approved:
• LESS TESTING TIME
The amount of time students spend taking mandatory exams will drop by
about 25% — or roughly two hours — this fall, state education officials
said.
Testing time nearly doubled last year after a new set of questions was
added to state tests to satisfy federal law. The time ballooned from an
average of 4½ hours to almost 9½ hours a year for many students.
In response to frustration over the longer testing times, officials
retooled the exams so the same set of questions can satisfy both state
and federal testing requirements.
''More items serve a dual purpose,'' said Keith Brewer, the state's
deputy education commissioner. ''We have cut back on the testing
time.''
But even with the changes, the average time will still hover at 6½ to 7
hours for most students.
''I don't think we're going to see it go back to the same amount of
time,'' he said.
• LINING UP STANDARDS
Tennessee might be tweaking its academic standards to make sure they
line up with what students are expected to know on a national level.
In the coming months, educators are going to look at the state's
academic standards for every grade and compare them with those designed
by the National Assessment of Education Progress, which puts out the
Nation's Report Card every year.
The goal is to make sure students can compete nationally.
''We'll see how they align or mirror our standards,'' Brewer said. ''We
hope there's some congruence there. We need that congruence to keep our
students on the cutting edge.''
Tennessee has participated voluntarily in some of the NAEP exams since
1992 but it no longer has a choice. All 50 states and Washington, D.C.,
must now test students in grades 4 and 8 every other year in reading
and math to comply with the federal No Child Left Behind law.
NAEP provides a national yardstick for measuring what students know in
key subjects. The results of the report card provide a tool for
comparing states, which have different academic standards and ways of
assessing students.
• CUTTING COSTS
While some states use the same test questions every year with little
change, Tennessee has required that nearly all the questions on
mandatory exams be brand-new every year.
State education officials said the rule created headaches for
test-makers and cost the state more money because it couldn't recycle
the same exams year after year.
Now the state is limiting the percentage of original questions that
must be used every year. About 70% of the test items will have to be
new, but any question can be reused after five years.
It's unknown how much the change will save taxpayers, and educators say
they doubt students will notice a difference because they won't be
taking the same test within a five-year period.
''We really defined what we meant by the term 'fresh and non-redundant'
items,'' Brewer said. ''We can now rotate forms. It's a savings for
us.''
— Claudette Riley
http://www.tennessean.com/education/archives/04/06/52878863.shtml?
Element_ID=52878863
---
Jason Barkeloo
President
TouchSmart Publishing
http://www.touchsmart.net
tele 513.225.8765
This electronic mail (email) communication, and any files transmitted
with it, are confidential, and intended solely for the indicated
recipient(s). Any review, use, or distribution by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, or are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender, and delete all copies
immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 7456 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/bridging_the_divide/attachments/20040615/4bc8c0fa/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Bridging_the_divide
mailing list