[CitizensTruth] Vote Rigging goes beyond touch screen machines, PA primary proves

[Geri Perry]

*Subject: *Xymphora: PA Touch screens love Hillary

Popular Canadian blogger Xymphora's note below on the PA primary reminds 
me that I've been meaning for weeks to write up my blog notes to the NYT 
article shortly after the Feb 5 NY State primary which informed us that 
in about 80 of 6,000+ precincts in NYC, Obama received Zero votes, 
including in a heavily black district in Harlem and in Brooklyn's Bed-Sty.
Xymphora's concerns below about PA are similar to the situation in the 
NH primary and who knows how many other states where the totals required 
adjustment in order to skew towards Hillary. (In some NH districts Ron 
Paul also received zero votes in the "unofficial" count.)
It's disheartening, shall we say, that we can't trust ANY of the numbers 
from these primaries not even in NYC which still allows voting on our 
trusty lever machines which with routine maintenance could last another 
50 years. So it's not simply the fault of computerized voting machines . 
It seems that political operatives are in place at central locations who 
are allowed to adjust the numbers which they get from local precincts. 
That seems to be the way that Bush won Florida in 2000, and Florida and 
Ohio in 2004, as well as his "3 million" vote win over Kerry in 2004. As 
Mark Crispin Miller has pointed out, it's beyond credibility that Bush's 
national vote total INCREASED by 11 million votes from 2000 to 2004.
Thus we Americans are well into our Banana Republic stage. Will we ever 
emerge?

*Xymphora wrote:
*Wednesday, April 23, 2008
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/ <http://xymphora.blogspot.com/>
Pennsylvania exit polls

Some people will believe anything other than the obvious:

/"It’s clear that a sizable chunk of those questioned after they voted 
lied to the pollsters. The exit polls showed a 5 point margin for 
Hillary. In the end the margin was approximately twice that."
/
So lemme get this straight: people who voted for Hillary were so 
embarrassed by that fact that they lied to exit pollsters and claimed 
they voted for Obama? Does that make any sense? Or does it make more 
sense that Pennsylvania, a state which makes heavy use of unverifiable 
computer touch-screen voting, was the victim of vote fraud? The 
difference between five percent and ten percent is the difference 
between Hillary having to drop out and Hillary staying in to help McCain 
win in November, a goal shared by both the Republicans (who own the 
computer voting machine companies) and Hillary (so she can run again in 
2012).