[CitizensTruth] Jim Fetzer 9/11 in Peoria was TERRIFIC!

[Connie Smith]

STARTLING 9/11 REALIZATIONS
A plane melts into a building instead of crashing; the surprise attacks carefully avoid U.S.military and political leaders; and vehicles' engine blocks melt from fire far from the scene, while their gas tanks are never affected.

from Connie Cook Smith
Thanks to Dan Sutton for getting superb 9/11 Truth speakers in Peoria!
- - -

Jim Fetzer is a delightful professor with a military, science, and philosophy background, resulting in a well-rounded and highly informative presentation.  Sometimes his voice passionately slides up several octaves as he highlights the number of absurdities present in the official story, several of which will be noted here.

A new perspective for myself was the simple physics of what happened -- or what didn't happen -- regarding something the nation has been shown over and over.  Looking at still photos from the rear view of the second plane diving into the tower, Prof. Fetzer has the temerity to ask the obvious question that most of us never think of: 

How is it the airliner is literally absorbed into the building with no resistance?  (There wasn't a fireball until afterwards.)

As a knife goes into soft butter, the plane went into the tower.  But we must realize -- that building wasn't butter.  It was steel and concrete. And the plane was aluminum and heavy and going very fast.  Where is the CRASH of a heavy airliner smacking into a steel and concrete skyscraper?  

No pieces of anything flew off, no shattered debris went scattering, no "unstoppable object hitting an unmoveable object" impact is observed.  There is only a smooth, physics-defying, almost dream-like blending of solid matter, as the plane and the building become one.  

Or as I recall seeing elsewhere: South Tower "swallows" Flight 175 -- and, airliner "disappears into" skyscraper.

I cared nothing for any speculation on this all these years.  But frankly, folks, it is freaking me out now! 

I'm reminded of Nafeez Ahmed's pioneering work soon after 9/11 -- his book, "The War on Freedom."  There he skillfully identified the horrors of that day as "psy-ops" -- sophisticated and deadly psychological operations -- which are especially well-developed on this planet by U.S. military and intelligence agencies -- designing events and imagery to traumatize people into doing whatever they're told to do afterwards.

Certainly for me, the idea and the images of an airliner-with-passengers crashing into an office-tower-with-people is so shocking that I, like most other human beings, simply suspend logic, go into shock, and accept that a mystical blending of huge separate objects is "just what happens" when a large plane crashes into a gigantic building.  They just merge, apparently.  There is no resistance, apparently -- UNLIKE all other crashes when metal hits metal -- and concrete.  

Related to this is Prof. Fetzer's commentaries elsewhere on the 17-second delay in TV broadcasting.  He had noticed, with family listening to a ballgame on radio because they liked the announcer but placed it next to the TV to watch the action, the TV action was coming in significantly behind the radio reality.  This delay allows for deletions or even quick changes in information when television broadcasters -- or their owners and masters -- feel it serves their interests.  

I myself remember some of the strange black-outs during Election 2000, as results were apparently changed and even anchor-persons looked quite startled.

On September 11th, when the second plane struck on live TV, the nose of the plane was shown emerging out the other side of the tower, in perfect shape, having passed through 200 feet of concrete and steel.  (If you think about it, this is an impossibility for an aluminum airplane nose cone.)  And then came the fireball.  Suddenly, both CNN and Fox flashed a visible signal.   "Fade to black!"  Those words are prominent on both stations.  Black-out the broadcast!  And they did.  Were they trying to protect us from the horror?

Well, no. When CNN repeated the footage 6 minutes later, the fireball was shown (again and again) in all its death-dealing destruction.  But their bottom-of-the-screen banner had been placed over and blocked the amazing image of the plane nose coming out through the tower, undamaged.  

It is alarming that both Fox and CNN tried to stop us from seeing the impossibly un-damaged nose cone in the first place, and that CNN only re-showed the strike with the perfect-shaped-plane-nose completely blocked.  They obviously did not want us to see something that could not be.  Which implies that at least SOME aspects of Flight 175 had to be video fakery, and the fakery had a boo-boo that then had to be covered up.

And on You Tube's September Clues Video 4, an eyewitness to the first tower strike -- and he worked for Fox, even! -- stated: "It definitely did not look like a commercial plane, I didn't see any windows on the side."

Many more details on these disturbing facts are at the links at bottom.

Also discussed was "the missile that hit the Pentagon" -- that is what Donald Rumsfeld called it -- and how that strike went out of its way to avoid hitting our military leaders on the other side of the complex.  Awfully nice terrorists that day, to murder only civilians and allow all of our leaders to remain perfectly safe -- including Bush at the school in Florida.  The Secret Service didn't even bother to hustle him to safety, even though it had been made clear, "America is under attack."  How did they know the President of the United States absolutely was not a target?

Back to the Pentagon. As Prof. Fetzer points out, who and what WAS hit there were the auditors and accountants tracking down the missing $2.3 trillion dollars announced by Rumsfeld the previous day.  They and all their records were at the point of impact at the Pentagon, and were destroyed.  Just as SEC files on Enron and other criminal records were destroyed in New York -- when the building known as WTC 7 collapsed for no reason later in the day.

Regarding WTC 7, building-owner Larry Silverstein is on record saying that, with a few small fires in it, he decided to "pull it," which means deliberately collapse it.  He said this in apparent forgetfulness that a lot of people know in order to do that, demolition charges had to be placed there days or even weeks in advance.  And indeed, that must have happened, for the building went down perfectly like the old casinos in Las Vegas.  So -- how long had this been planned?  Silverstein bought "terrorism insurance" for the World Trade Center complex 6 weeks before September 11th.  The 9/11 Commission Report refuses to even mention the destruction of WTC 7 -- because it broaches the subject of the towers being rigged to fall as well.

And by now, everyone who cares knows that low-temp airliner-fuel-fires, which the firemen had said were already pretty much knocked down anyway, could never bring down even a small steel-core building.  As has been pointed out, "In 1975, fires burned 6 floors of WTC1 for 180 minutes (lower-down floors, 9-14), with no sprinklers."  Nothing collapsed.  Nothing even sagged.  "In 2001, fires burned 5-6 floors of WTC1 for less time, 102 minutes (upper floors, 94-98), with sprinklers."  But somehow, with much less fire in a shorter time in 2001, everything including people suddenly turned to dust -- except for papers.  They didn't even burn.

This brings us to what I think could be THE BIGGEST SMOKING GUN OF 9/11 TRUTH.  Prof. Fetzer showed a few slides from a collection of shocking photos that I myself have been boggled by for the last several years.  Prof. Judy Wood calls them Toasted Cars.

They are pictures from September 11th that the media never showed you:  The incomprehensible disintegration of the towers suddenly caused 1400 emergency vehicles and cars and trucks -- some as far as half a mile away -- to ignite in extremely strange fires.  

Burning engine blocks melted the fronts of cars, while the rear ends (with oh-so-flammable gas tanks) remained shiny new.  Interiors were incinerated, while parts of exteriors were unaffected by flames.  Front grills popped out, windows blew from the inside, many tires turned to puddles of goo, yet other parts of the same vehicles remained pristine.  Even when a few vehicles were fully engulfed in flames, none of the surrounding paper debris had caught fire.

Why would the towers' collapse ignite fires in so many vehicles -- but not in nearby buildings, etc. -- and why as far as half a mile away?  And why were the fires so highly selective in what and how they burned, seemingly "going for" relatively ungrounded vehicle electrical systems and "ignoring" the gas tanks -- and paper?

I'm thinking even a few teams of Junior High science project students -- Teachers, are you listening? -- could demonstrate that this phenomenon means that some uncommon energy source was at work.  It seems likely that whatever pulverized the towers to microns of dust -- in itself an unprecedented happening in history -- also set off fires peculiar to the electrical systems of vehicles.  What is it?  Where did it come from?  Who did that?

Oh, right -- Osama bin Laden in a cave, I forgot.  Even the FBI makes it clear there is no evidence bin Laden was connected to 9/11.  In a Pakistani newspaper not long after, bin Laden himself explained he didn't do it, and who probably did. (You'd think he'd want to take credit for it).  

Only weird videos purporting to be him -- talk about fakery! -- later claimed responsibility.  No messy Lee Harvey Oswald situation this time -- where the public heard the "communist guy" deny the triumph of bringing down the leader of the free world -- then had to be shot to shut him up.  The Bin Laden patsy was allowed to just disappear, and his denials never made the American press.

Below is the link to the numerous photos of Toasted Cars.  I defy anyone to look at them and not understand that a new and terrible force, advanced weaponry, was perpetrated on the people of New York.  And then to figure out that this was done in order to frame Muslims for the purpose of invading the Middle East.  It was even done to make sure the criminally-connected owner of the obsolete and asbestos-laden towers didn't have to pay for impossibly expensive demolition -- while even getting paid himself, via his timely "terrorist insurance." 

Well, I hope at least some car buffs are motivated to dig into "what the hell happened to all those cars???!"  (And to some drivers, no doubt!)  Better yet -- this needs to be pounced on by numerous reputable scientists from all over the world, who aren't paid off or coerced by global political and military agendas.

Please forward this and let your friends and family know some of the things that really happened on 9/11.  
- - -

To get your take on the plane coming out THROUGH the building and then CNN covering it up, go to minute 4:20 on the below link, and continue on out for about 5 minutes
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ga89OCTf0jE

Here you can read Prof. Fetzer's comments on what seems to be faked that day and how
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_james_fe_070726_mounting_evidience_o.htm

THIS COULD BE THE SMOKING GUN OF 9/11.  Whatever turned the towers (and people) to micro-particles of dust also melted vehicles in ways that have never been seen before.  Scroll on down past the Diane Sawyer interview and look at those photos!
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam5.html#toasted

Besides Fetzer's own website, linked to Steven Jones -- http://st911.org/ --  he highly recommends Alan Miller's Patriots Question 9/11, a thorough compendium of professionals and experts in aviation, academia, engineering, military, law enforcement and more who have good reasons to believe the government's account of 9/11 is not true.  http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/  

As always, if links aren't live, please copy and paste into your browser.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20080429/8c52b2e3/attachment-0001.html>