[CitizensTruth] ARTICLE - Plans

[Walterb306 at cs.com]

All,

FYI. 

One of the questions is:  how much do the legislators themselves know?  If 
they are aware of any of this, they should be crying from the rooftops.

Beverley

http://uweb.txstate.edu/~lf14/conspire/rex84.html


FEMA And REX 84 
In April 1984, President Reagan signed Presidential Directorate Number 54 
that allowed FEMA to engage in a secret national "readiness exercise" under the 
code name of REX 84. The exercise was to test FEMA's readiness to assume 
military authority in the event of a "State of Domestic National Emergency" 
concurrent with the launching of a direct United States military operation in Central 
America. The plan called for the deputation of U.S. military and National 
Guard units so that they could legally be used for domestic law enforcement. These 
units would be assigned to conduct sweeps and take into custody an estimated 
400,000 undocumented Central American immigrants in the United States. The 
immigrants would be interned at 10 detention centers to be set up at military 
bases throughout the country. REX 84 was so highly guarded that special metal 
security doors were placed on the fifth floor of the FEMA building in Washington, 
D.C. Even long-standing employees of the Civil Defense of the Federal 
Executive Department possessing the highest possible security clearances were not 
being allowed through the newly installed metal security doors. Only personnel 
wearing a special red Christian cross or crucifix lapel pin were allowed into 
the premises. Lt. Col. North was responsible for drawing up the emergency plan, 
which U.S. Attorney General William French Smith opposed vehemently. 
The plan called for the suspension of the Constitution, turning control of 
the government over to FEMA, appointment of military commanders to run state and 
local governments and the declaration of Martial Law. The Presidential 
Executive Orders to support such a plan were already in place. The plan also 
advocated the rounding up and transfer to "assembly centers or relocation camps" of a 
least 21 million American Negroes in the event of massive rioting or 
disorder, not unlike the rounding up of the Jews in Nazi Germany in the 1930s. 
The second known time that FEMA stood by was in 1990 when Desert Storm was 
enacted. Prior to President Bush's invasion of Iraq, FEMA began to draft new 
legislation to increase its already formidable powers. One of the elements 
incorporated into the plan was to set up operations within any state or locality 
without the prior permission of local or state authorities. Such prior permission 
has always been required in the past. Much of the mechanism being set into 
place was in anticipation of the economic collapse of the Western World. The war 
with Iraq may have been conceived as a ploy to boost the bankrupt economy, 
but it only pushed the West into deeper recession. 
The third scenario for FEMA came with the Los Angeles riots after the Rodney 
King brutality verdict. Had the rioting spread to other cities, FEMA would 
have been empowered to step in. As it was, major rioting only occurred in the Los 
Angeles area, thus preventing a pretext for a FEMA response. On July 5, 1987, 
the Miami Herald published reports on FEMA's new goals. The goal was to 
suspend the Constitution in the event of a national crisis, such as nuclear war, 
violent and widespread internal dissent, or national opposition to a U.S. 
military invasion abroad. Lt. Col. North was the architect. National Security 
Directive Number 52 issued in August 1982, pertains to the "Use of National Guard 
Troops to Quell Disturbances." The crux of the problem is that FEMA has the 
power to turn the United States into a police state in time of a real crisis or a 
manufactured crisis. Lt. Col. North virtually established the apparatus for 
dictatorship. Only the criticism of the Attorney General prevented the plans 
from being adopted. But intelligence reports indicate that FEMA has a folder with 
22 Executive Orders for the President to sign in case of an emergency. It is 
believed those Executive Orders contain the framework of North's concepts, 
delayed by criticism but never truly abandoned. 
Now, FEMA is on stand by once again. Due to the terrorist attacks on New York 
and the Pentagon, and the ensuing "war on terror" known as Operation Enduring 
Freedom, the president can declare martial law under the guise of "national 
security."
The crisis, as the government now see it, is civil unrest. For generations, 
the government was concerned with nuclear war, but the violent and disruptive 
demonstrations that surrounded the Vietnam War era prompted President Nixon to 
change the direction of emergency powers from war time to times of domestic 
unrest. Diana Raynolds, program director of the Edward R. Murrow Center, summed 
up the dangers of FEMA today and the public reaction to martial law in a drug 
crisis: "It was James Madison's worst nightmare that a righteous faction would 
someday be strong enough to sweep away the Constitutional restraints designed 
by the framers to prevent the tyranny of centralized power, excessive 
privilege, an arbitrary governmental authority over the individual. These restraints, 
the balancing and checking of powers among branches and layers of government, 
and the civil guarantees, would be the first casualties in a drug-induced 
national security state with Reagan's Civil Emergency Preparedness unleashed. 
Nevertheless, there would be those who would welcome NSC (National Security 
Council) into the drug fray, believing that increasing state police powers to 
emergency levels is the only way left to fight American's enemy within. In the 
short run, a national security state would probably be a relief to those whose 
personal security and quality of life has been diminished by drugs or drug 
related crime. And, as the general public watches the progression of institutional 
chaos and social decay, they too may be willing to pay the ultimate price, one 
drug free America for 200 years of democracy." 
The first targets in any FEMA emergency would be Hispanics and Blacks. The 
FEMA orders call for them to be rounded up and detained. Tax protesters, 
demonstrators against government military intervention outside U.S. borders, and 
people who maintain weapons in their homes are also targets. Operation Trojan 
Horse is a program designed to learn the identity of potential opponents to 
martial law. The program lures potential protesters into public forums, conducted by 
a "hero" of the people who advocates survival training. The list of names 
gathered at such meetings and rallies are computerized and then targeted in case 
of an emergency. 
The most shining example of America to the world has been its peaceful 
transition of government from one administration to another. Despite crises of great 
magnitude, the United States has maintained its freedom and liberty. This 
nation now stands on the threshold of rule by non-elected people asserting 
non-Constitutional powers. Even Congress cannot review a Martial Law action until 
six months after it has been declared. For the first time in American history, 
the reigns of government would not be transferred from one elected element to 
another, but the Constitution, itself, can be suspended. The scenarios 
established to trigger FEMA into action are generally found in the society today: 
economic collapse, civil unrest, drug problems, terrorist attacks, and protests 
against American intervention in a foreign country. All these premises exist, it 
could only be a matter of time in which one of these triggers the entire 
emergency necessary to bring FEMA into action, and then it may be too late, 
because under the FEMA plan, there is no contingency by which Constitutional power 
is restored. 
There are now over 600 prison camps in the United States, all fully 
operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by 
full-time guards, but they are all empty.
Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will 
be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. 
Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the 
program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal 
government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will 
head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the 
Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.
The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from 
the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the 
camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of 
these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is 
a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2 million people.
Terry Kings wrote an article on his discoveries of camps located in southern 
California. Here are some of his findings:
The first camp we observed was in Palmdale, California. It is not operating 
as a prison at the moment but is masquerading as part of a water facility. Now 
why would there be a facility of this nature out in the middle of nowhere with 
absolutely no prisoners? The fences that run for miles around this large 
facility all point inward, and there are large mounds of dirt and dry moat 
surrounding the central area so the inside area is not visible from the road. There 
are 3 large loading docks facing the entrance that can be observed from the 
road. What are these massive docks going to be loading?
We observed white vans patrolling the area and one came out and greeted us 
with a friendly wave and followed us until we had driven safely beyond the area. 
What would have happened had we decided to enter the open gate or ask 
questions?
This facility is across the street from the Palmdale Water Department. The 
area around the Water Department has fences pointing outward, to keep people out 
of this dangerous area so as not to drown. Yet, across the street, the fences 
all point inward. Why? To keep people in? What people? Who are going to be it’
s occupants?
There are also signs posted every 50 feet stating: State of California 
Trespassing Loitering Forbidden By Law Section 555 California Penal Code. The sign 
at the entrance says: Pearblossom Operations and Maintenance Subcenter 
Receiving Department, 34534 116th Street East. There is also a guard shack located at 
the entrance.
We didn’t venture into this facility, but did circle around it to see if 
there was anything else visible from the road. We saw miles of fences with the top 
points all directed inward. There is a railroad track that runs next to the 
perimeter of this fenced area. The loading docks are large enough to hold 
railroad cars.
Another site is located in Brand Park in Glendale. There are newly 
constructed fences (all outfitted with new wiring that point inward). The fences 
surround a dry reservoir. There are also new buildings situated in the area. We 
questioned the idea that there were four armed military personnel walking the park. 
Since when does a public park need armed guards?
A third site visited was in the San Fernando Valley, adjacent to the Water 
District. Again, the area around the actual Water District had fences logically 
pointing out (to keep people out of the dangerous area). And the rest of the 
adjacent area which went on for several miles was ringed with fences and barbed 
wire facing inward. Also interesting was the fact that the addition to the 
tops of the fences were fairly new as to not even contain any sign of rust on 
them. Within the grounds was a huge building that the guard said was a training 
range for policemen. There were newly constructed roads, new gray military 
looking buildings, and a landing strip. For what? Police cars were constantly 
patrolling the several mile perimeter of the area.

>From the parking lot of the Odyssey Restaurant a better view could be taken 

of the area that was hidden from site from the highway. There was an area that 
contained about 100 black boxes that looked like railroad cars. We had heard 
that loads of railroad cars have been manufactured in Oregon outfitted with 
shackles. Would these be of that nature? From our position it was hard to 
determine.
In searching the Internet, I have discovered that there are about 600 of 
these prison sites around the country. They are manned, but yet do not contain 
prisoners. Why do they need all these non-operating prisons? What are they 
waiting for? We continuously hear that our current prisons are overcrowded and they 
are releasing prisoners because of this situation. But what about all these 
facilities? What are they really for? Why are there armed guards yet no one to 
protect themselves against? And what is going to be the kick-off point to put 
these facilities into operation?
What would bring about a situation that would call into effect the need for 
these new prison facilities? A man-made or natural catastrophe? An earthquake, 
a massive poisoning, a panic of such dimensions to cause nationwide panic?
Once a major disaster occurs (whether it is a real event or manufactured 
event) martial law is hurriedly put in place and we are all in the hands of the 
government agencies (FEMA) who thus portray themselves as our protectors. Yet 
what happens when we question those in authority and how they are taking away 
all of our freedoms? Will we be the ones detained in these camp sites? And who 
are they going to round up? Those with guns? Those who ask questions? Those 
that want to know what’s really going on? Does that include any of us? The 
seekers of truth?
When first coming across this information I was in a state of total denial. 
How could this be? I believed our country was free, and always felt a sense of 
comfort in knowing that as long as we didn’t hurt others in observing our 
freedom we were left to ourselves. 
Once we challenge that freedom we find out how free we really are. How many 
are willing to take up that challenge? Very few indeed, otherwise we wouldn’t 
find ourselves in the situation that we are in at the present time. We wouldn’t 
have let things progress and get out of the hands of the public and into the 
hands of those that seek to keep us under their control no matter what it 
takes, and that includes the use of force and detainment for those that ask the 
wrong questions.
Will asking questions be outlawed next? Several instances have recently been 
reported where those that were asking questions that came too near the untold 
truth were removed from the press conferences and from the public’s ear. Also, 
those that wanted to speak to the press were detained and either imprisoned, 
locked in a psychiatric hospital, murdered (through make-believe suicides) or 
discredited.
Why are we all in denial over these possibilities? Didn’t we hear about 
prison camps in Germany, and even in the United States during World War II? 
Japanese individuals were rounded up and placed in determent camps during the 
duration of the War. Where was their freedom?
You don’t think it could happen to you? Obviously those rounded up and killed 
didn’t think it could happen to them either. How could decent people have 
witnessed such atrocities and still said nothing? Are we going to do the same 
here as they cart off one by one those individuals who are taking a stand for the 
rights of the citizens as they expose the truth happening behind the scenes? 
Are we all going to sit there and wonder what happened to this country of 
ours? Where did we go wrong? How could we let it happen?

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20080629/01afbf4c/attachment-0001.html>