[CitizensTruth] does it matter who "wins" the election? [was:Philip Berg Obama ...]

[Deanna Spingola]

Despite popular misconceptions, our government is a representative Republic
(not a democracy). In both democracies and Republics people vote. That
single act does not make you free. Those who finagle their way into office
are supposed to represent the voters who allegedly put them there. They are
also supposed to sustain an invariable written law – the Constitution which
mandates civil law and our response to it. The non-negotiable Constitution
is our explicit gauge of right and wrong, applicable to all without special
considerations for occupations such as politicians, sports stars or
“insider” corporate criminals. Since Woodrow Wilson, we have descended into
a Socialistic democracy (adaptable mob rule, adjustable laws and poll driven
public opinions). All democracies, in which selective enforcement of law is
rampant, are short lived, for they typically morph into oppressive tyrannies
 

Whenever laws are passed, under whatever form, if they do not represent the
will of the majority of the people or their desires, then they represent
oppression. America today has an oppressive government because it passes
laws against the will of the people. Thus, we no longer have a Republic. A
strong case can be made that America in the 21st century is an Empire, as
was Britain in the 19th. Any government that would even consider an issue as
ludicrous as hate crimes, the concept of policing thought, is in very
serious jeopardy. 

Of the three branches of government, only the legislative branch is
authorized to make law. Presidential executive orders have been
unconstitutionally used to make law. The Judicial branch, the Supreme Court,
is supposed to interpret the constitutionality of a law. Rather, they invent
new interpretations never envisioned by the founding fathers. It is the duty
of the Supreme Court to interpret the constitution as ratified by the states
 not to invent preposterous meanings which were not originally intended by
the authors. The judiciary makes law through changing precedents as well as
by invention, neither of which are constitutionally authorized.

The foregoing is from one of my articles.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20081103/32061eb8/attachment-0001.html>