[CitizensTruth] Icke on Obama

[andrew ritter]

I'm
sure there are a variety of opinions on David Icke, but I think he has
some pretty solid arguments against Obama.  I have included some
highlights below.  Full posting is very long and sometimes wanders, but
also has a lot of indisputable facts & worth a read here:

Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor
http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/18281


I studied the military/government mind-control
programmes and techniques in great detail for many years during the
late-1990s and across 2000, and the Obama 'phenomenon' is the most
blatant mass-mind control operation you could wish to see.

At its core the plan has been to make Obama the focus
of everything you hope for, believe in and want to change. This is why
it has been crucial for him not to specify and detail what is meant by
his 'hope, 'change' and 'believe'. 

However, I can tell you what those words mean in the context of the Obama mind-game. They mean whatever you decide they mean or want them
to mean. The idea is for you to project all that you stand for onto him
and so he becomes the symbol of you and how you see the world.
Specifics would destroy that 'I am whatever you want me to be' scenario
and so you don't get any detail, just 'hope', 'change', and 'believe'. 

They don't want him to be seen only as 'the Messiah';
they also want him to be Abraham Lincoln, JFK, or Buddha - anyone you
choose to project on him, for he is a blank page, blank screen and
empty suit. Obama is a make-your-own, do-it-yourself leader, a
projection of your own mind. (If you are still asleep, that is. If you
are in any way awake, he's an open book.)
There is no more powerful way of manipulating people
than to tell them what they want to hear and to keep shtum about
anything they wouldn't like. Double-glazing salesmen are trained to
pick up in general conversation what their target likes and dislikes
and to respond accordingly in the way the product is sold. The
technique is simply to tell the potential buyer what you have gleaned
they want to be told. 

Obama comes from the same stable, but on a massively
bigger scale and with a whole network of advisors and controllers
steeped in the art of manipulating minds, opinions and actions. 

Obama's written-for-him speeches are not from the
heart, but from the autocue. The 'heart' bit comes from extensive
training and his Bill Clintonesque ability to 'mean it when he says
it', a state of delivery that goes beyond mere acting. Tony Blair was
trained in the same way. 

But if you take a step back and look at these people
dispassionately you can clearly see the techniques they consciously
employ. Blair is the most blatant fraud in the way he delivers a line,
stops in mid-sentence for emphasis and looks down for fake emotional
effect. Obama is a little more slick, but, from where I have been
looking this past year, not much. And how have people not seen those
cold eyes just above the painted smile?

You can watch his mind working, turning between
autocue screens to his left and right, then straight down the camera
for his key messages. From-the-heart orators don't do that; they are
too immersed in what they are feeling and saying to give even a passing
thought to where they are looking or how the line is delivered. 

I worked in television for more than a decade, often
reading autocue while a director spoke in my ear telling me what
cameras to look at. I have, since the early 1990s, spoken my truth on
public stages across the world. I know, therefore, the difference
between artificial autocue delivery and body language and talking from
the heart without a script. Obama, I repeat, is coming from the
autocue, not the heart. 
As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an
exercise in mass mind control and it has been so successful because so
many people live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of
which brings me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and
similar regimes throughout history. 

Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like
Hitler, but the themes are just the same. Germany was in a terrible
state economically and militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the
First World War and the reparations inflicted on the country by the
Rothschild/Illuminati-controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.
As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its
true sense is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. 

It
might end up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass
movement from within the people who have no understanding of what the
'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means. They
just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make it mean
what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their horror,
what they have signed up for. 
Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush
and Obama. The Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati
controlled Bush for eight years and led the country into foreign wars
and financial chaos (bad guy/problem); now the 'Democratic' wing, led
by the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour',
Barack Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change'
(good guy/solution). 

Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.

Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and
'believe', few have any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public
perception comes from having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection,
not the fine print because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes
are cast and even then he will hide it in his windbag words. 

There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not.
He says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he
does about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops,
including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war? He
has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military force to
stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed Hillary 'Let's
bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on
Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and re-appointed Bush's 'Let's
bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council
on Foreign Relations). So that's the 'change we can believe in', then. 

Obama isn't against war at all and, if his
controllers have their way, he will engage the US in even more foreign
conflicts with the troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their
targets, on a wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face
who would never go where he's sending them.

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_022009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20090216/377b7be0/attachment.html>