[CitizensTruth] Icke on Obama

[Connie Smith]

I personally think this description borders on paranoia -- which does NOT come from a condition of mental health.

When I met Obama a couple of times in 2002 in the little rooms of small-town IL politics, I'd like to know where those auto-cue cards were -- as he engaged in totally at-ease, spontaneous conversations, which are the very same as his expressions now in front of millions of people.  Blair's obvious fakery and Clinton's obvious manipulations are nowhere to be seen in Obama's deeply natural behavior.

And he risked his entire political career by rallying Illinoisans in Chicago in 2003 along with the millions of others of us OUTSIDERS, against any invasion of Iraq.  THEY would've had to "start training him" after that, because his speech on the outright stupidity of an invasion blistered their behinds and was intended to stop it from happening.

I'm pretty sure the extraordinary two humanitarian women who raised him immunized him against the attempts there no doubt have been to own him.  As he rose to national prominence, he did strategically engage the powers-that-be in order to not be killed.  But I think in time, because of his nature, we'll see just how much he's using them instead of them using him.

I think we'll be pleased at the counter-coup to the long takeover of our nation that Obama will pull off in time.

Connie




----- Original Message ----- 
  From: andrew ritter 
  To: truth seekers 
  Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 12:44 AM
  Subject: [CitizensTruth] Icke on Obama



  I'm sure there are a variety of opinions on David Icke, but I think he has some pretty solid arguments against Obama.  I have included some highlights below.  Full posting is very long and sometimes wanders, but also has a lot of indisputable facts & worth a read here:

  Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor
  http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/18281


  I studied the military/government mind-control
  programmes and techniques in great detail for many years during the
  late-1990s and across 2000, and the Obama 'phenomenon' is the most
  blatant mass-mind control operation you could wish to see.

  At its core the plan has been to make Obama the focus
  of everything you hope for, believe in and want to change. This is why
  it has been crucial for him not to specify and detail what is meant by
  his 'hope, 'change' and 'believe'. 

  However, I can tell you what those words mean in the context of the Obama mind-game. They mean whatever you decide they mean or want them
  to mean. The idea is for you to project all that you stand for onto him
  and so he becomes the symbol of you and how you see the world.
  Specifics would destroy that 'I am whatever you want me to be' scenario
  and so you don't get any detail, just 'hope', 'change', and 'believe'. 

  They don't want him to be seen only as 'the Messiah';
  they also want him to be Abraham Lincoln, JFK, or Buddha - anyone you
  choose to project on him, for he is a blank page, blank screen and
  empty suit. Obama is a make-your-own, do-it-yourself leader, a
  projection of your own mind. (If you are still asleep, that is. If you
  are in any way awake, he's an open book.)
  There is no more powerful way of manipulating people
  than to tell them what they want to hear and to keep shtum about
  anything they wouldn't like. Double-glazing salesmen are trained to
  pick up in general conversation what their target likes and dislikes
  and to respond accordingly in the way the product is sold. The
  technique is simply to tell the potential buyer what you have gleaned
  they want to be told. 

  Obama comes from the same stable, but on a massively
  bigger scale and with a whole network of advisors and controllers
  steeped in the art of manipulating minds, opinions and actions. 

  Obama's written-for-him speeches are not from the
  heart, but from the autocue. The 'heart' bit comes from extensive
  training and his Bill Clintonesque ability to 'mean it when he says
  it', a state of delivery that goes beyond mere acting. Tony Blair was
  trained in the same way. 

  But if you take a step back and look at these people
  dispassionately you can clearly see the techniques they consciously
  employ. Blair is the most blatant fraud in the way he delivers a line,
  stops in mid-sentence for emphasis and looks down for fake emotional
  effect. Obama is a little more slick, but, from where I have been
  looking this past year, not much. And how have people not seen those
  cold eyes just above the painted smile?

  You can watch his mind working, turning between
  autocue screens to his left and right, then straight down the camera
  for his key messages. From-the-heart orators don't do that; they are
  too immersed in what they are feeling and saying to give even a passing
  thought to where they are looking or how the line is delivered. 

  I worked in television for more than a decade, often
  reading autocue while a director spoke in my ear telling me what
  cameras to look at. I have, since the early 1990s, spoken my truth on
  public stages across the world. I know, therefore, the difference
  between artificial autocue delivery and body language and talking from
  the heart without a script. Obama, I repeat, is coming from the
  autocue, not the heart. 
  As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an
  exercise in mass mind control and it has been so successful because so
  many people live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of
  which brings me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and
  similar regimes throughout history. 

  Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like
  Hitler, but the themes are just the same. Germany was in a terrible
  state economically and militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the
  First World War and the reparations inflicted on the country by the
  Rothschild/Illuminati-controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.
  As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its
  true sense is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. 

  It
  might end up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass
  movement from within the people who have no understanding of what the
  'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means. They
  just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make it mean
  what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their horror,
  what they have signed up for. 
  Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush
  and Obama. The Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati
  controlled Bush for eight years and led the country into foreign wars
  and financial chaos (bad guy/problem); now the 'Democratic' wing, led
  by the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour',
  Barack Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change'
  (good guy/solution). 

  Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.

  Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and
  'believe', few have any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public
  perception comes from having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection,
  not the fine print because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes
  are cast and even then he will hide it in his windbag words. 

  There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not.
  He says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he
  does about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops,
  including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war? He
  has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military force to
  stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed Hillary 'Let's
  bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on
  Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and re-appointed Bush's 'Let's
  bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council
  on Foreign Relations). So that's the 'change we can believe in', then. 

  Obama isn't against war at all and, if his
  controllers have their way, he will engage the US in even more foreign
  conflicts with the troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their
  targets, on a wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face
  who would never go where he's sending them.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. See how it works. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  CitizensTruth mailing list
  CitizensTruth at six.pairlist.net
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/citizenstruth
  website: http://citizenstruth.info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20090216/5c7908a2/attachment.htm>