[CitizensTruth] Icke on Obama

[Kris Knight]

One of the advantages of a very, very broad range of resources that  
come in is that I am getting a broad range of opinions/reads on Pres.  
Obama.  If I weren't, I'd likely be living in a world of despair right  
now.  But I'm not.  At all.  I feel more like the Kali energy in me is  
holding me in good stead right now.  (Look that up; a type of Black  
Madonna energy; very comfortable with processes involving death...as a  
part of transformation, DEstructuring..to make room for the new).  It  
is abundantly clear that major structures of behavior are being both  
revealed and weakened depending on your viewpoint and what informs  
you.  For anyone who ONLY views the world from a political standpoint,  
this is as limited as ONLY viewing the world from the standpoint of a  
religion or a culture that thinks it is the center of the universe.
I have followed Icke's work for many years now and am thankful I came  
to know him.  However, I do think he generally gives WAY more time/ 
energy to castigating than talking about other viewpoints that give  
people more hope for what is to come, not necessarily in our  
lifetimes.  He talks about that, but proportionately much less than I  
think he could, and perhaps should consider, given his current  
influence on what others are willing to consider as truth.
We could for sure have solid arguments against every one of us on this  
list, but that would not necessarily mean we are each ONLY that or  
even PRIMARILY that.  And apparently the forces out to "GET" PRes.  
Obama at this time are formidable.  Let's all keep in mind that when  
we "speak" of him or "think" of him in really negative terms, we  
further their cause....

On Feb 16, 2009, at 12:44 AM, andrew ritter wrote:


>

> I'm sure there are a variety of opinions on David Icke, but I think  

> he has some pretty solid arguments against Obama.  I have included  

> some highlights below.  Full posting is very long and sometimes  

> wanders, but also has a lot of indisputable facts & worth a read here:

>

> Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor

> http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/18281

>

>

> I studied the military/government mind-control

> programmes and techniques in great detail for many years during the

> late-1990s and across 2000, and the Obama 'phenomenon' is the most

> blatant mass-mind control operation you could wish to see.

>

> At its core the plan has been to make Obama the focus

> of everything you hope for, believe in and want to change. This is why

> it has been crucial for him not to specify and detail what is meant by

> his 'hope, 'change' and 'believe'.

>

> However, I can tell you what those words mean in the context of the  

> Obama mind-game. They mean whatever you decide they mean or want them

> to mean. The idea is for you to project all that you stand for onto  

> him

> and so he becomes the symbol of you and how you see the world.

> Specifics would destroy that 'I am whatever you want me to be'  

> scenario

> and so you don't get any detail, just 'hope', 'change', and 'believe'.

>

> They don't want him to be seen only as 'the Messiah';

> they also want him to be Abraham Lincoln, JFK, or Buddha - anyone you

> choose to project on him, for he is a blank page, blank screen and

> empty suit. Obama is a make-your-own, do-it-yourself leader, a

> projection of your own mind. (If you are still asleep, that is. If you

> are in any way awake, he's an open book.)

> There is no more powerful way of manipulating people

> than to tell them what they want to hear and to keep shtum about

> anything they wouldn't like. Double-glazing salesmen are trained to

> pick up in general conversation what their target likes and dislikes

> and to respond accordingly in the way the product is sold. The

> technique is simply to tell the potential buyer what you have gleaned

> they want to be told.

>

> Obama comes from the same stable, but on a massively

> bigger scale and with a whole network of advisors and controllers

> steeped in the art of manipulating minds, opinions and actions.

>

> Obama's written-for-him speeches are not from the

> heart, but from the autocue. The 'heart' bit comes from extensive

> training and his Bill Clintonesque ability to 'mean it when he says

> it', a state of delivery that goes beyond mere acting. Tony Blair was

> trained in the same way.

>

> But if you take a step back and look at these people

> dispassionately you can clearly see the techniques they consciously

> employ. Blair is the most blatant fraud in the way he delivers a line,

> stops in mid-sentence for emphasis and looks down for fake emotional

> effect. Obama is a little more slick, but, from where I have been

> looking this past year, not much. And how have people not seen those

> cold eyes just above the painted smile?

>

> You can watch his mind working, turning between

> autocue screens to his left and right, then straight down the camera

> for his key messages. From-the-heart orators don't do that; they are

> too immersed in what they are feeling and saying to give even a  

> passing

> thought to where they are looking or how the line is delivered.

>

> I worked in television for more than a decade, often

> reading autocue while a director spoke in my ear telling me what

> cameras to look at. I have, since the early 1990s, spoken my truth on

> public stages across the world. I know, therefore, the difference

> between artificial autocue delivery and body language and talking from

> the heart without a script. Obama, I repeat, is coming from the

> autocue, not the heart.

> As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an

> exercise in mass mind control and it has been so successful because so

> many people live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of

> which brings me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and

> similar regimes throughout history.

>

> Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like

> Hitler, but the themes are just the same. Germany was in a terrible

> state economically and militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the

> First World War and the reparations inflicted on the country by the

> Rothschild/Illuminati-controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in  

> 1919.

> As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its

> true sense is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy.

>

> It

> might end up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass

> movement from within the people who have no understanding of what the

> 'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offered really means.  

> They

> just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make it  

> mean

> what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their horror,

> what they have signed up for.

> Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush

> and Obama. The Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the Illuminati

> controlled Bush for eight years and led the country into foreign wars

> and financial chaos (bad guy/problem); now the 'Democratic' wing, led

> by the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour',

> Barack Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and 'change'

> (good guy/solution).

>

> Hence even some more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.

>

> Apart from the unspecified 'hope, 'change' and

> 'believe', few have any idea what Obama's policies will be. Public

> perception comes from having an 'image' of him, or a self-projection,

> not the fine print because Obama doesn't do fine print until the votes

> are cast and even then he will hide it in his windbag words.

>

> There is an 'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not.

> He says he's against the invasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he

> does about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops,

> including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war?  

> He

> has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military force  

> to

> stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed Hillary 'Let's

> bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on

> Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and re-appointed Bush's  

> 'Let's

> bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates (Bilderberg Group,  

> Council

> on Foreign Relations). So that's the 'change we can believe in', then.

>

> Obama isn't against war at all and, if his

> controllers have their way, he will engage the US in even more foreign

> conflicts with the troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of  

> their

> targets, on a wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face

> who would never go where he's sending them.

>

> Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. See  

> how it works._______________________________________________

> CitizensTruth mailing list

> CitizensTruth at six.pairlist.net

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/citizenstruth

> website: http://citizenstruth.info


Kris Knight of WellAware Life Enhancement Center
Phone:  1-608-ALL-LIFE
welaware at merr.com






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20090216/1bd1743d/attachment.htm>