[CitizensTruth] "We lied about everything" - alleged NASA quote

[Connie Smith]

A movie entitled "Moon Rising" will have a special premier in L.A. on January 22.  Details are at the "moonrising" link below.  

I found the trailer on the website to be not the least bit helpful in illustrating any truth to the startling quote attributed to a BellCom/NASA Insider -- that everything that NASA has told us about the moon is not true.

There's even a better trailer on another website (link below), but nothing too convincing is there, either.  The extensive moonscape footage in both trailers is almost annoying in that it takes a bit of your time, but delivers nothing more than one intriguing anomaly on the moon.  (To me, anyway.)  

Also, there is, as one reviewer describes it, "a cinematic bombardment of music."  I agree, based on what little I've seen.  The intense soundtrack seems way out of proportion to what one is seeing -- although, maybe out of context -- in the trailers.

However, filmmaker Jose Escamilla has a legendary reputation in his world for coming up with data and supposed footage and interviews that no one else has done, most especially in his previous effort: "UFO, The Greatest Story Ever Denied."  That film's premise opens with "somewhere in the back of your mind" you've always known or suspected the truth about the reality of UFOs.

Due to my own extensive personal experiences, I have that info in the FRONT of my mind, and have had, for going on 30 years now.  So that, for me, lends some credibility to this filmmaker -- which in turn lends some credibility to his Moon Rising premise(s), which apparently are --

-- that NASA knows full well there are alien-created structures on the moon, maybe even settlements.  

-- and our moon-landings did not take place.

The reported quote on the second trailer is a response to a questioner saying, "So you guys lied about a lot of things..."  And the NASA Insider allegedly saying, "No, we didn't just lie about certain things.  We lied about everything."  The Moon Rising movie premiering on January 22 purports to prove this.

The main reason I'm distributing this still-to-me-uncertain information is the almost predictable pattern I've noticed with cover-ups.  The most important questions get ignored.

When JFK was killed when I was 15, I was puzzled and ever-remained so that his alleged assassin, the nefarious "Communist, U.S. defector-to-Russia" Lee Harvey Oswald did not at all brag or gloat about his enormous accomplishment of taking down the leader of the free world.  He was actually denying it!  He was even saying he was "just a patsy" -- meaning that others did it, then framed him.  As we breathlessly waited for more insight into that, he was shot and killed by Jack Ruby, who in turn suddenly died in prison not long afterwards.

Why would Oswald deny his communistic triumph and worldwide claim to fame?  More specifically, why were we told the story that he did it when he said he didn't -- and even the authorities admitted there was no gunpowder residue on him, that he had not fired a gun that day.

Same with Osama bin Laden and 9/11. We saw some videos that didn't look like him "claiming credit" in a language that most Americans don't speak.  But in an extensive interview in a Pakistani newspaper, bin Laden is quoted explaining why he did not do it, couldn't do it, and "the interests" who probably did.  Once again, no chest-pounding triumph for an enemy's SUCCESS in attacking "the Great Satan."  Instead, articulate explanations quite to the contrary.

Not to mention the fact that Mohammed Atta and gang were reported by all their neighbors to be drinking, drugging, womanizing yahoos -- not "Muslim fundamentalists" at all.  By Islamic standards, not one of them would be allowed into the heaven of Allah.  MEANING -- once again we were told what to believe about "who did it."  But once again, it didn't make any sense.

On back to Roswell, 1947.  Why would an intelligent Air Force officer not be able to identify "weather balloon" remains -- which we were told was the story after the apparent truth was revealed the day before, that instead they were strange-quality pieces of an evidently alien craft.

And so, likewise, with moon landings.  First, we are to believe that such missions of excessively complicated precision problem-solving were carried out with computers with less capacity than the one at my fingertips nowadays.  

And MAINLY, there has never before in history been a pathway carved out by man -- whether across dangerous oceans, monumental mountains, or deadly deserts -- that didn't result in further development, to the point of regular traffic and commerce being the norm from then on.

But the moon?  If we achieved that, why then did we not proceed to establish ourselves there and fly back and forth from then on?  For heaven's sake, if it were true, by now wouldn't we would have "McMoonald's" franchises operating there full-steam?!  Once again, what we've been told doesn't make sense -- and as one speaker on the Moon Rising trailer states, this may be "the most monumental lie in history."

As to why "all those good guys would lie," it's psychologically understandable.  But we'll leave that for another day.

Connie

http://www.moonrising-themovie.com/home.html

better trailer
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/15178/Moon_Rising_by_Jose_Escamilla____Movie_Trailer/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20090104/bf94e69b/attachment.html>