[CitizensTruth] What?

[Chuck Minne]

From: http://www.examiner.com/x-12837-US-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m9d18-Unidentified-creature-resembling-alien-found-in-Panama-another-Montauk-Monstervideo-and-photos
 
 

Unidentified creature resembling alien found in Panama, another Montauk Monster?(video and photos)
 
 

September 18, 5:10 PMUS Headlines ExaminerCharisse Van Horn

Not being one who looks for U.F.O.s or aliens, I must admit that this creature has me thinking. The story begins in Panama in a community known as Cerro Azul. There is no doubt that this unidentified creature looks as if it is straight out of 1977’s Spielberg classic, Close Encounters of the Third Kind.  Is it another Montauk Monster? Just what it is, however, no one knows; not the zoologists who are examining its corpse or the teens who state that they killed it when it came towards them. The organism looks unlike anything currently known to man, and the resemblance towards humankind’s depiction of aliens is uncanny. Could this have possibly been some form of life from another planet? 

Some think that it might be another Montauk Monster, another unidentified animal that surfaced in Montauk, New York in July 2008.  Others think it might be an animal that had lost its fur, and possibly one that was in the middle stages of decomposition; however, that doesn’t coincide with the teens' story that the creature was alive and moved toward them. According to the teens, last Saturday, while playing in a creek, they saw the creature and it began moving towards them. The teens became scared and began throwing rocks at it, and killed it. The story continues that the children threw the creature into the creek and left, but later returned to photograph it.

Zoologists are unsure what it is, but have stated that it resembles a dead fetus. The truth to the mystery might be in whether or not the teens have exaggerated their story or not. Should the truth be that they came upon the unidentified creature’s corpse, it could easily be an animal in stages of decomposition. However, if their tale that the alien like creature was alive and moved towards them, and they killed the creature, that would be completely different. From the image, it is difficult to tell if there are signs of injuries that would have occurred from rocks.

Whether or not Panamanian zoologists will perform DNA testing on the creature has yet to be announced. Undoubtedly, scientists worldwide are going to want to examine this creature’s DNA.
 
Here is a link to another video that shows the unidentified creature, alien, or Montauk Monster in the Panama creek.
 

Unidentified creature resembling alien found in Panama, another Montauk Monster?(video and photos)
 
(There is also a different video at the site linked at the top.)




 

 
We Can't Afford Health Care? You Lie!
 
    We see the spectacle of the US Congress unable to manage decent health care reform that will actually enable the American citizenry to join the rest of the industrialized world in having health care for all. The problems, it is clear, come from those who are lying. 
 
    Death panels? That's true - we already have them. Insurance companies deny care to Americans, who then die as a result. It happens every day, Sarah Palin - but ascribing that to the Obama plan is untrue. In fact, those corporate death panels would be outlawed. 
 
    Find the language in Obama's bill that says that illegal aliens are covered or admit it's a canard - God forbid we should help some migrant worker who is stricken by illness or accident while laboring in service to Americans. South Carolina's Joe Wilson is just the Tourette tip of a dissembling iceberg. 
 
    We can't afford the plan? That is a whopper. It's all choice. 
 
    If every child in America doesn't have health care, but we own more than 6,000 nuclear weapons, more than half of them on board a fleet of 18 extremely expensive Trident submarines ready to fight the Soviets (Hey! Where'd they go?), isn't it time to ask some fundamental questions? One is: Why spend $16.5 billion just on the Department of Energy nuclear weapons budget for FY 2010 with 50 million uninsured citizens? Does US Sen. Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) speak for us all when he calls health care a privilege (and presumably threatening life on Earth is a human right for the US military)? 
 
    When our working poor are so often without either the money to pay for health insurance or the high costs of health care for ailing family members, and yet we somehow manage to justify spending in excess of $915 billion on the so-called War on Terror, shouldn't we engage in some national discussion about priorities? 
 
From:  http://www.truthout.org/091609R
 



 



 

--- On Tue, 9/29/09, Richard Fobes <richardfobes at hotmail.com> wrote:


From: Richard Fobes <richardfobes at hotmail.com>
Subject: [CitizensTruth] NYC CAN Decision For a New 9/11 Investigation Expected By End of Week
To: "Citizen's.Truth" <citizenstruth at six.pairlist.net>, "Daniel Allen" <alphamis1 at yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 11:28 PM




Incredible stuff..

One excerpt - "The Judge proceeded to invite discourse on why an investigation was needed.  When McMahon raised as an example the 9/11 Commission’s omission of the collapse of Building 7 from its final report, the Judge replied in puzzlement, 'Building what?' "

Another excerpt - "With order restored, the Judge again asked Kitzinger if the City had done anything to investigate 9/11.   Kitzinger flatly responded, 'No.' 


'The City never did anything?' retorted the Judge in disbelief.  Nothing, Kitzinger admitted."







Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:23:42 -0400
To: richardfobes at hotmail.com
From: tedwalter at nyccan.org
Subject: Decision Expected By End of Week















 
Decision On Petition’s Legality Expected By End of Week

9/29/09

Supreme Court Justice Edward Lehner has begun consideration of NYC CAN’s motion to reject Referee’s Louis Crespo’s recommendation that the NYC CAN 9/11 petition not be submitted to the voters on November 3.  The petition would ask whether or not there should be an independent New York City investigation into 9/11. 


Responding to a motion brought by NYC CAN attorney Dennis McMahon, a hearing was held Tuesday September 29 at the New York State Supreme Court, and concluded with the understanding that the Court will likely render a decision on the petition’s legality by Friday, October 2.  


The City’s previously assumed deadline of September 30—spurred by the printing deadline for military absentee ballots—was brushed away by Judge Lehner as he suggested the printing of absentee ballots would likely not be ordered on Wednesday, September 30, since runoff elections were being held while the Court was in session.  Even if the ballots were ordered on Wednesday, Lehner indicated, this should not prevent the referendum from being put before the vast majority of the electorate who would be voting in New York City. 


Judge Lehner’s postponement of the supposed deadline came after McMahon had requested that the Judge carefully consider both sides’ arguments, rather than render a rush decision and fail to adequately contemplate NYC CAN’s legal arguments, as the Referee had done.
 
Initially there was a question as to whether oral arguments would go forward as a clerical mishap resulted in the Judge not being presented with the papers on time.  As a result of the snafu, the procedure for the Court to hear arguments was inverted, whereby oral arguments were heard first and served to orient the Judge.  

Over the next few days the Judge will go through both sides’ legal memos, as well as the applicable statutes and case law.  

Surprisingly, the file forwarded from the Referee to the Judge did not contain NYC CAN’s legal memo, which McMahon told the Court seemed apropos, since the referee had barely considered the Petitioners’ memorandum of law.  
 
The Judge proceeded to invite discourse on why an investigation was needed.  When McMahon raised as an example the 9/11 Commission’s omission of the collapse of Building 7 from its final report, the Judge replied in puzzlement, “Building what?”

When asked by the Judge whether or not there has been an investigation into 9/11 by New York City authorities, Steve Kitzinger, the City’s lawyer, replied, “It’s irrelevant”, to which the packed courtroom was loudly disdainful, some openly laughing in disbelief.  At which point Mr. Kitzinger prevailed upon Judge Lehner to quiet the crowd, which the Judge did.  

 
With order restored, the Judge again asked Kitzinger if the City had done anything to investigate 9/11.   Kitzinger flatly responded, “No.”



“The City never did anything?” retorted the Judge in disbelief.  Nothing, Kitzinger admitted.

As part of his unrelenting attack on the NYC CAN petition, Kitzinger repeatedly alluded to the proposed commission’s intention to investigate national security matters beyond its jurisdiction such as “intelligence failures”.  A simple reading of the petition shows such assertions to be completely unfounded. 


Later, Judge Lehner seemed unimpressed by Kitzinger’s argument pertaining to the limited jurisdiction of New York City to investigate 9/11, on the grounds of inherent limits to a municipality’s subpoena power.  “You can investigate anything, can’t you?” the Judge asked rhetorically.  “Because somebody may have jurisdiction over certain witnesses doesn’t mean you can’t have a commission.”

On the complicated question of the commission being a privately funded entity but still having subpoena power granted under the auspices of New York City government, the Judge made comments that gave the Petitioners hope for a favorable ruling.  “You want a law that says this private commission shall have the right to subpoena people?”  To which McMahon assented.  Offering similar examples, the Judge noted, “A private lawyer can issue subpoenas… a lawyer issues [subpoenas] in connection with an action [during] litigation in court.”  


After the hearing, the consensus among NYC CAN members and supporters in attendance was that Judge Lehner is intrigued by the proposed referendum, and that he will give both sides’ arguments due consideration.  

Near the end of the hearing, McMahon stated emphatically, “The citizens are desperate.  We want to find out what really happened on 9/11.” 

__________________________________________ 

March For Answers 9/27/09

 See The March


Daniel Sunjata's Rousing Speech

  

RAW STORY Covers MARCH FOR ANSWERS  
 





 Thinkers think and talkers talk.  Patriots ACT.
 
www.NYCCAN.org
















Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check it out. 
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
CitizensTruth mailing list
CitizensTruth at six.pairlist.net
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/citizenstruth
website: http://citizenstruth.info



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/citizenstruth/attachments/20090930/b5158307/attachment-0001.html>