<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="State"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="country-region"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="PlaceType"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="PlaceName"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="City"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="place"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:Arial;
        color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>This was forwarded to me
recently, and I thought I would pass it on. I had my doubts about the
original Zeitgeist movie, and haven't seen the sequel, but Mr. Griffin's
intelligent analysis makes it certain in my mind that the movie is nothing but
clever disinformation. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Ragen<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Friends...<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Wow! I finally DID
watch the original Zeitgeist film in its entirety a month or so ago. I'm a big
fan of the clip from that film that's on<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>youtube: "North
American Union/RFID chip truth". I liked the film, tho I wasn't sure what
to make of the 1st part on Christianity. So I took it w/ a grain, thought I'd
figure it out in time, & meanwhile be open to it as "food 4
thought".<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Then I saw the
"Zeitgeist Addendum" posted on a friend's page, & I watched maybe
the 1st 15 mins of it. It seemed good in the beginning, as it states that the
Federal Reserve is a harmful entity. I figured that the rest would go into all
that only more thoroughly, & I started to recommend watching it to ppl.
Then on the excellent, informative & empowering Alex Jones show ( listen at
infowars.com), Jones was analyzing parts of this film & contesting it. He
said that alot of the info in it was false & dangerous. He played parts of
the narrative on the air, & then he gave answers as to why these statements
in the film are wrong. He also said that he's not saying the film maker is
necessarily bad, but IS clearly misinformed. Alex was hoping to have the film
maker on his show soon to discuss these Issues. But apparently no one really
knows who the film maker is? Seems he works in the media tho & has access
to great production tools etc. WOW! No wonder I<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> shrugged off watching
the original Zeitgeist 4 so long! <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Here is G Edward
Griffin's response to the film. He agrees w/ Alex Jones'<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>view of it. As always, while
reading anything by Mr Griffin, it is clear how well he knows his subject.
Again I recommend visiting his site ( freedomforceinternational.org), &
watching the video there, "An Idea Whose Time Has Come", reading the
Creed of Freedom, etc, & JOINING FREEDOM FORCE. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Here is what he has to
say about this new sequel to Zeitgeist. Please take a look! There is always
much to be learned by reading anything by Mr Griffin as he sites very good
points & concepts. Right now, the information he shares on the world
situation is stuff we can no longer ignore.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <a
href="http://freedomforceinternational.org/pics/analysisheader.gif">http://freedomforceinternational.org/pics/analysisheader.gif</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> ZEITGEIST ADDENDUM - A
CRITICAL REVIEW<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> ) 2008 by G. Edward
Griffin 2008 OCTOBER 9<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Hello Mr. <st1:City
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Griffin</st1:place></st1:City>. I'm sure you
have heard of the popular movie on the internet, Zeitgeist. It had three
separate parts about Christianity being fake, the Federal Reserve being a
conspiracy and bad, and that the government was involved in 9/11. Well the
sequel just came out, Zeitgeist Addendum, and it seems very dangerous. This
movie screams controlled opposition/false solution propaganda more than
anything I have ever seen.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> The movie starts off
with why the Federal Reserve is bad. It seems to latch onto valid concerns that
the freedom movement/Ron Paul supporters have been worried about. But its
solution is really, really bad and is already sending a lot of people in the
wrong direction. It goes on to say that money is evil and has caused every
problem in the world. If only we abolished all money and private property
everything would be great. All resources should collectively belong to all
humans of the world.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Intelligent management of
resources and technology could allow everyone to be free. The world would turn
into some utopia. All crime would go away and greed and corruption would go
away. We should be a one world community. It even specifically says that voting
for liberty candidates like Ron Paul is the wrong thing to do. I guess we
should give up all hope and let bad politicians do whatever they want to us.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> It is full of
doublespeak, wild assumptions, and crazy socialist propaganda. It also put in
more about how religion is bad. I am convinced this thing was specifically made
to stop the liberty movement from achieving anything. It puts in just enough
truths that we believe in to trick people into following the wrong path.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> I think statements
about what is wrong with this film from liberty organizations like Freedom
Force International would do a lot of good and would prevent some people from
going in the wrong direction. Some people might think the best idea is to just
ignore it and it will go away. But it appears to be incredibly popular online
and gaining support. Even the most popular Ron Paul website posted the video.
And the most popular Ron Paul message board has three threads with hundreds of
posts talking about it.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Here is the video link.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Jonathan, 2008 Oct 6<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> REPLY FROM EG:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Jonathan, I don't like
to criticize anything that is helping to spread the truth about the Federal
Reserve and 9/11 but I must agree with the substance of what you have said
about this video. I watched it two nights ago and was deeply disturbed by its
message. At first, I thought it would be best to just let it play itself out in
expectation that most viewers would cross it off as whacky. However, the
production value is high, the effects and sound score are compelling, and there
is enough truth embedded in the beginning to capture the attention and possibly
the trust of many within the freedom movement. So here are my comments on a few
items of<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>concern:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>> 1. The information
about the Federal Reserve is, for the most part, <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>> right<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>on target. However, I practically
fell out of my chair when the program repeated that old, silly argument about
the Fed not creating enough money to cover the cost of interest on debt; and,
therefore, the world must forever be in debt. I knew right there that the
writer did not read The Creature from <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName
w:st="on">Jekyll</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType w:st="on">Island</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>
or, if he did, he forgot my analysis of this common myth. For those who are
interested in that topic, it is fund on pages 191-192 of The Creature.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>> 2. The next jolt came
when the program praised Civil War Greenbacks,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>calling them debt-free.
Actually, Greenbacks were contrary to the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Constitution and, although
they were not fiat money issued by the banks, they were fiat money issued by
the government. That was better than paying interest on nothing to bankers, but
they still wiped out the purchasing power of American money through massive
inflation. They can not correctly be called debt-free, either, because they
represented debt on the shoulders of the government, which means, of course, on
the shoulders of the taxpayers. It never ceases to amaze me how people think
that the solution to money created out of nothing by those big, bad bankers is
to have money created out of nothing by those nice, trustworthy politicians.
Yet, that is what this program supports.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>> 3. There is a lengthy
segment in which the author of I Was an Economic<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Hit Man, John Perkins, tells
the story of how propagandists in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>manipulated public opinion
to support military action against several Latin American countries. Then
Perkins says that these propagandists scared Americans by telling them that the
leaders of these countries were Marxists who were aligned with the Soviets.
This, of course, is a half truth that is just as dangerous as a total lie. It
is true about the propagandists and their strategy to scare the public into
supporting military intervention in those countries, but it is false to portray
those dictators as great humanitarians who cared only for the well being of
their people. That is total bunk. They WERE aligned with the Soviet Union and
they WERE part of a Marxist/Leninist strategy to dominate <st1:place w:st="on">Latin
America</st1:place>; a strategy that continues to this day.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> There was plenty not
to like on both sides of that struggle, but<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>objective historians would
never depict the Rhodesians (the CFR crowd in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region>) as bad guys but depict the
Soviet puppets as good guys. In his book, Perkins reveals this same slant. He
exposes the foul tactics of international corporations, the IMF, and World
Bank, but he never mentions a Leftist dictator, such as Fidel Castro or Hugo
Chavez without praising them. Perkins is a collectivist aligned with the Left,
and that strongly influences his telling of this story. Yet the producers of
the video make no mention of this bias and give him an inordinate amount of
time to present his slanted view without challenge.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>> 4. Perhaps the biggest
insult to our intelligence is the main theme of<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>the program. It is that
profits are the root of all our problems today.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>That being the case, we must
change mankind to reject profit and we must work together on some other basis.
It is never quite clear what that basis is, but, whatever it is, it will be
administered and directed by an elite group, at least in the beginning. I was
stunned by the fact that this is pure Marxism. Mark theorized that people had
to be re-educated (in labor camps, if necessary) to cleanse their minds of the
profit motive. He and his disciples, such as Lenin and Stalin and Khrushchev,
said that, eventually, the character of man would be purged of greed, and then
the state would wither away because it no longer would be needed. Sure! We saw
that in the Soviet Union and <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">China</st1:place></st1:country-region>,
right? Yet this Marxist nonsense is exactly what is offered in this video
program. It is Communism without using the name.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>The profit motive is neither
good nor bad. It can be applied either way depending on social and political
factors. The desire for profit is merely the desire to be compensated for our
labor, our creativity, our knowledge, or even for our risk. Without profit,
very little would be accomplished in the world - not even if everyone spent a
few years in labor camps to be re-educated. It is a basic part of man's nature
and is the mainspring of human progress, as Henry Grady Weaver described it in
his book by that same title. Throughout history, whenever man lived in a system
that allows him to be rewarded for his work, there has been great productivity
and abundance. By contrast, where social engineers gained control of the state
and restricted people from receiving the fruits of their labor, productivity
fell, and scarcity was the norm.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> The profit motive
functions differently in different political systems.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>In a free system where
government does not intervene in the market place, the profit motive always
will manifest itself as competition, each person or each company trying to
deliver better quality products and services at lower prices. That was how it
used to be in the early days of <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>,
and that is what led to the greatest outpouring of productivity and abundance
the world has ever seen. However, in a collectivist system where government
controls every conceivable aspect of economic and commercial activity (the
system that now exists in America), the profit motive always manifests itself
as a quest for political influence and laws to favor one group over another.
The net effect is to eliminate competition in the market place.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Under collectivism, success
is achieved, not by creating better products and services for less cost, but by
controlling legislators and government agencies. It is a system of
legalized plunder, as Frederic Bastiat called it in his famous treatise, The
Law. Unfortunately, it is the system that dominates most of the world today.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Zeitgeist Addendum
ignores this reality. At one point the narrator even says that the greatest
evil in the world today is "the free enterprise system." That's an
incredible statement, especially inasmuch as the free enterprise system has
been dead for several decades. It lives in name only.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>The whole world now is in
the grips of non-competitive monopolies and cartels that have forged
partnerships with governments. All of the evils to which this program alludes
are the result, not of the free enterprise system, but of the abandonment of
free enterprise and the adoption of collectivism. This program creates a
mythological boogeyman and then advocates more of the very thing that has
brought us to the mess we are in today.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>The enemy of mankind is not
profit. It is a political system of big government. Yet, this program is
supportive of some of the most notable big-government collectivist on the
planet. Marxist/Leninists may be enemies of collectivists in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City
w:st="on">Washington</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">DC</st1:State></st1:place>,
but they are collectivists in their own right. The Communist model is no better
than the Nazi model.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> There is much more
that could be said about other program topics such as technology supposedly
being our salvation, about the a future world in which no one has to work, and
about common ownership of land, oceans, natural resources, etc. but, for the
most part, these merely are sub issues to the ones already described, so I will
spare my readers the pain of further discourse.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> In summary, this
program does NOT offer a cure. It offers a mega dose <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Of the disease itself.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> Ed Griffin, 2008 Oct 9<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>
<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>