<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16788" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>A movie entitled "Moon Rising" will have a
special premier in L.A. on January 22. Details are at the
"moonrising" link below. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I found the trailer on the website to
be <EM>not</EM> the least bit helpful in illustrating any truth to the
startling quote attributed to a BellCom/NASA Insider -- that everything
that NASA has told us about the moon is not true.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>There's even a better trailer on another website (link below),
but nothing too convincing is there, either. The extensive moonscape
footage in both trailers is almost <EM>annoying</EM> in that it takes a bit
of your time, but delivers nothing more than one intriguing anomaly on the
moon. (To me, anyway.) </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Also, there is, as one reviewer describes it, "a cinematic
bombardment of music." I agree, based on what little I've
seen. The intense soundtrack seems way out of proportion to what
one is seeing -- although, maybe out of context -- in the
trailers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><STRONG>However</STRONG>, filmmaker Jose Escamilla has a
legendary reputation in his world for coming up with data and supposed footage
and interviews that no one else has done, most especially in his previous
effort: "UFO, The Greatest Story Ever Denied." That film's premise opens
with "somewhere in the back of your mind" you've always known or suspected the
truth about the reality of UFOs.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Due to my own extensive personal experiences,<STRONG>
I</STRONG> have that info in the FRONT of my mind, and have had, for going on 30
years now. </FONT><FONT size=2>So that, for me, lends some credibility to
this filmmaker -- which in turn lends some credibility to his Moon Rising
premise(s), which apparently are --</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>-- that NASA knows full well there are alien-created
structures on the moon, maybe even settlements. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>-- and our moon-landings did not take place.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The reported quote on the second trailer is a response to a
questioner saying, "So you guys lied about a lot of things..." And the
NASA Insider allegedly saying, "No, we didn't just lie about certain
things. We lied about everything." The Moon Rising movie premiering
on January 22 purports to prove this.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The main reason I'm distributing this still-to-me-uncertain
information is the almost <EM>predictable</EM> pattern I've noticed with
cover-ups. The most important questions get ignored.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>When JFK was killed when I was 15, I was puzzled and
ever-remained so that his alleged assassin, the nefarious "Communist, U.S.
defector-to-Russia" Lee Harvey Oswald did not at all brag or
gloat about his enormous accomplishment of taking down the leader of the
free world. He was actually denying it! He was even saying he was
"just a patsy" -- meaning that others did it, then framed him. As we
breathlessly waited for more insight into that, he was shot and killed by Jack
Ruby, who in turn suddenly died in prison not long afterwards.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Why would Oswald deny his communistic triumph
and worldwide claim to fame? More specifically, why were we told the
story that he did it when he said he didn't -- and even the authorities admitted
there was no gunpowder residue on him, that he had not fired a gun that
day.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Same with Osama bin Laden and 9/11. We saw some videos
that didn't look like him "claiming credit" in a language that most Americans
don't speak. But in an extensive interview in a Pakistani newspaper, bin
Laden is quoted explaining why he did not do it, couldn't do it, and "the
interests" who probably did. Once again, no chest-pounding triumph
for an enemy's SUCCESS in attacking "the Great Satan." Instead,
articulate explanations quite to the contrary.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Not to mention the fact that Mohammed Atta and gang were
reported by all their neighbors to be drinking, drugging, womanizing yahoos --
not "Muslim fundamentalists" at all. By Islamic standards, not one of them
would be allowed into the heaven of Allah. MEANING -- once again we were
told what to believe about "who did it." But once again, it didn't make
any sense.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>On back to Roswell, 1947. Why would an intelligent Air
Force officer <EM>not be able to identify</EM> "weather balloon" remains --
which <EM>we were told</EM> was the story after the apparent truth
was revealed the day before, that instead they were
strange-quality pieces of an evidently alien craft.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>And so, likewise, with moon landings. First, we are to
believe that such missions of excessively complicated precision problem-solving
were carried out with computers with less capacity than the one at my fingertips
nowadays. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>And MAINLY, there has never before in history been a pathway
carved out by man -- whether across dangerous oceans, monumental
mountains, or deadly deserts -- that didn't result in further development,
to the point of regular traffic and commerce being the norm from then
on.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>But the moon? If we achieved that, why then did we not
proceed to establish ourselves there and fly back and forth from then on?
For heaven's sake, if it were true, by now wouldn't we would have
"McMoonald's" franchises operating there full-steam?! Once again,
what we've been told doesn't make sense -- and as one speaker on the Moon Rising
trailer states, this may be "the most monumental lie in history."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>As to why "all those good guys would lie," it's
psychologically understandable. But we'll leave that for another
day.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Connie</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A
href="http://www.moonrising-themovie.com/home.html">http://www.moonrising-themovie.com/home.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>better trailer</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A
href="http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/15178/Moon_Rising_by_Jose_Escamilla____Movie_Trailer/">http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/15178/Moon_Rising_by_Jose_Escamilla____Movie_Trailer/</A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>