[dcc2] NAT traversal for direct connections

[Dave Johnson]

Whoops, I meant TLS (under 8.2 Shared Secret Requests)

-- 
Dave

peter green writes:
> STUN does not require ssl
> read the rfc
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3489.html
> there is absoloutely no mention of ssl
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dcc2-bounces at dcc2.org [mailto:dcc2-bounces at dcc2.org]On Behalf Of
> Dave Johnson
> Sent: 25 May 2004 16:30
> To: DCC2 Working Group List
> Subject: RE: [dcc2] NAT traversal for direct connections
> 
> 
> 
> STUN certanly looks interesting, but to me it seems overly
> complicated.  If I read it correctly it requires an external server to
> setup the connection.  Where is this?  Are we going to suggest the IRC
> server do this or even integrate something into ircd?  Why in the
> world would STUN require SSL just to let you send it a udp packet.
> 
> I started putting together a proposal for automatic NAT/firewall
> traversal, I'll see if I can finish that up in the next few days and
> send it out.
> 
> --
> Dave
>