[LEAPSECS] Schedule for success
    Poul-Henning Kamp 
    phk at phk.freebsd.dk
       
    Sun Dec 21 17:30:30 EST 2008
    
    
  
In message <407EB3F6-55BB-4E60-8D20-C909EA92E6B9 at noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
>Consider the iconic issue of timekeeping for trains, one of the  
>primary drivers for our current standard time zone system.  Trains  
>clearly need to be synchronized with external clocks.  Trains clearly  
>have some mechanism or set of procedures (imperfect or not) for doing  
>so.  So they don't match the question asked.
Modern trains run at speeds of roughly 100 m/s.  They care very much
about seconds and fractions thereof.
In fact, they run so fast that a special version of the GSM mobile
standard called "GSM-R", has been created for train-control
applications.
The main difference between plain GSM and GSM-R is that the latter
allows for dopplershift up to 140 m/s, but now railway people have
started bitching about that not being enough margin.
If you want to know what non-antique rail-road control looks like,
search for and study "ERTMS".
Poul-Henning
-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list