[LEAPSECS] civil-solar correlation with TI
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Fri Dec 26 14:06:34 EST 2008
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Rob Seaman wrote:
>
> Whatever the preferences of the ITU, they will discover that it is
> simply unacceptable to allow local dates to vary secularly from civil
> timekeeping dates.
Civil time *is* a form of local time.
> Only one - standard time based on mean solar time - has ever been shown
> to be *practically* workable.
Two: standard time plus daylight saving time is the other (provided DST
is applied according to national rules).
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
SHANNON: SOUTHEASTERLY 4 OR 5, INCREASING 6 OR 7 IN SOUTH. MODERATE OR ROUGH.
MAINLY FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list