[LEAPSECS] We can all be winners
    Rob Seaman 
    seaman at noao.edu
       
    Sun Dec 28 23:10:38 EST 2008
    
    
  
Impossible to keep up with all the messages.  Presumably it will calm  
down when the leap second turns out to be a non-issue yet again ;-)
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> I contend we don't actually need a mean solar time to the sub-second  
> time scale for civil time.  A mean solar time to the hour is likely  
> sufficient for that.
The key issue is the stability of the civil timescale, not its  
precision.  However, degrading the precision by 5 orders of magnitude  
in one gulp seems rather...excessive.  The actual proposal on the  
table, of course, simply denies the existence of the Sun in the sky.
Rob
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list