[LEAPSECS] Schedule for success

[Michael Sokolov]

Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:


> Time-lords make a point about it nontheless: whenever somebody talks

> about using TAI for something, they state in no uncertain terms that

> this is not to be done.


Then let's just call it TAPF for Temps Atomique Pedant-Free.  TAPF is
identical with TAI in all ways but one single exception: when the pedants
say "you can't use TAI", that doesn't apply to TAPF because the latter
is pedant-free!

MS