[LEAPSECS] How good could civil timekeeping be?
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Thu Feb 14 03:16:36 EST 2008
In message <1EE6D186-6694-4CCC-B256-CDCAF8449164 at noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
>> What are your comments to my proposal to announce leap seconds 10
>> years in advance?
>It would require more detail to amount to a proposal...
No, that's all there is to it.
I don't care how you decide the leapseconds, or who does, as long
as we get know when they happen with 10 years notice.
If WP7A pushed a proposal that just changed the text to say that
DUT1 should be kept minimal and that warnings must be 10 years,
would that work ?
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS