[LEAPSECS] How good could civil timekeeping be?
msokolov at ivan.Harhan.ORG
Thu Feb 14 17:45:37 EST 2008
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> This is the point where the POSIX people shot us in the feet by
> ignoring leap-seconds.
Why care about POSIX at all? Why not use a non-POSIX UNIX system then?
> The time_t type, contains the number of SI seconds since 1970-01-01
> 00:00:00 UTC *ignoring all leapseconds*.
Dunno about POSIX, but in UNIX-in-4-capitals which predates POSIX,
time_t does NOT mean what you say. UNIX as opposed to POSIX time_t
measures the angle by which the hands of a wall clock have rotated since
since they displayed midnight 1970-01-01 in Greenwich. It is a wall
clock rotation angle and has absolutely nothing to do with SI seconds or
physical time interval.
> And down at a hairsbreadth, you cannot by looking at a time_t value,
> tell the leap second from the second right before it. (In some
> cases it's the second after, but that's clearly a bug since the
> leap second is the last second in the preceeding 24 hour UTC period.)
Rubber seconds solve this problem.
More information about the LEAPSECS