[LEAPSECS] How good could civil timekeeping be?

Tony Finch dot at dotat.at
Fri Feb 15 08:58:33 EST 2008


On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Richard B. Langley wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Tony Finch wrote:

>

> >> For a shorter version see Seidelmann's writeup in

> >> Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac,

> >> University Science Books, 1992

> >

> >Not the more recent edition?

> >http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1891389459/

>

> Is that just a paperback version of the 1992 hardcover edition? Any text

> differences at all?


A friend tells me there have been some revisions:
http://fanf.livejournal.com/80822.html?thread=341174#t341174

Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
SOUTH UTSIRE: SOUTHERLY 3 OR 4 VEERING WESTERLY 5. MODERATE OR ROUGH. FAIR.
GOOD.


More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list