[LEAPSECS] How good could civil timekeeping be?
dot at dotat.at
Fri Feb 15 08:58:33 EST 2008
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Richard B. Langley wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Tony Finch wrote:
> >> For a shorter version see Seidelmann's writeup in
> >> Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac,
> >> University Science Books, 1992
> >Not the more recent edition?
> Is that just a paperback version of the 1992 hardcover edition? Any text
> differences at all?
A friend tells me there have been some revisions:
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
SOUTH UTSIRE: SOUTHERLY 3 OR 4 VEERING WESTERLY 5. MODERATE OR ROUGH. FAIR.
More information about the LEAPSECS