[LEAPSECS] operational time -- What's in a name?
Greg Hennessy
greg.hennessy at cox.net
Fri Mar 28 09:01:01 EDT 2008
> although naive math is, well, naive, more code exists that assumes,
> for example, that midnight it time_t % 86400 == 0 than you want to
> believe. Changing this is really bad karma.
The current situation is that code like your example does not accurately
reflect reality. I advocate changing the code. You advocate changing reality.
> Fuck the telescopes software. it is order of magnitudes less common
> than anything else as to be irrelevant than things like ntp.
Attitudes like fuck certain people's software don't seem useful to me.
> Leap seconds are evil and must die.
That is an opinion that not everyone shares.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list