[LEAPSECS] operational time -- What's in a name?
Steve Allen
sla at ucolick.org
Fri Mar 28 11:19:05 EDT 2008
On Fri 2008-03-28T11:42:25 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ:
> Simply not true. A good place to start is the FreeBSD ports-tree
> which contains about 18000 piece of open source software.
Is there a detailed inventory of how many of those break in 2038?
And how many break as binaries vs. how many would work if recompiled?
If the ITU-R cannot find a unilateral stance then it may be time to
start thinking compromise.
Is getting the leaps out of the system's time_t worth the other hassle?
--
Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list