[LEAPSECS] operational time -- What's in a name?
Rob Seaman
seaman at noao.edu
Fri Mar 28 18:14:29 EDT 2008
Working backwards through the messages.
On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:22 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> How is that any different than the ITU defining UTC to generally
> behave as time has behaved for centuries, except that leap seconds
> have a new notation (the :60 stuff)?
ITU didn't create UTC since they didn't exist at the time.
Grep for messages from Mark Calabretta as to why UTC isn't multi-valued.
Rob Seaman
NOAO
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list