[LEAPSECS] Seems relevant somehow
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Mar 31 01:46:38 EDT 2008
In message <20080331053541.GA1522 at ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:
>On Sun 2008-03-30T22:27:36 -0700, Steve Allen hath writ:
>> I would love to know the meaning of "recently".
>>
>> Was it 6 months of notice, or less than Daniel Gambis gives?
>
>Hmmm, at least for NSW it was less than 6 months.
>Legislation passed 2007-10-23
>
>http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/cru/ll_cru.nsf/pages/cru_daylightsaving
>
>Someone please tell me again why the zoneinfo files would need 10
>years of advance notice if they were to absorb responsibility for leap
>seconds.
Because stupid handling of timezones is something politicians you
vote for do, and consequently there is a feedback loop that can
discourage such behaviour.
Leapseconds are mandated by a bunch of scientists who are not accountable
for anybody if they suddenly decide to issue leapseconds with 1 month
notice.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list