[LEAPSECS] The relation between calendars and leap seconds.
Pete Forman
pete.forman at westerngeco.com
Thu Nov 13 04:47:19 EST 2008
At 2008-11-12 15:02 +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
>32 bit POSIX time is signed so extends back before its
>(proleptic) epoch of 1970-01-01, and it's not unreasonable to use negative
>times to represent (say) timestamps on files archived from the 1960s.
That is not so. The POSIX definition of Seconds Since the Epoch contains:
>If the year is <1970 or the value is negative, the relationship is undefined.
--
Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent
pete.forman at westerngeco.com -./\.- the opinion of Schlumberger or
http://petef.22web.net -./\.- WesternGeco.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list