[LEAPSECS] The relation between calendars and leap seconds.
    Pete Forman 
    pete.forman at westerngeco.com
       
    Thu Nov 13 04:47:19 EST 2008
    
    
  
At 2008-11-12 15:02 +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
>32 bit POSIX time is signed so extends back before its
>(proleptic) epoch of 1970-01-01, and it's not unreasonable to use negative
>times to represent (say) timestamps on files archived from the 1960s.
That is not so.  The POSIX definition of Seconds Since the Epoch contains:
>If the year is <1970 or the value is negative, the relationship is undefined.
-- 
Pete Forman                -./\.-  Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco                  -./\.-   by myself and does not represent
pete.forman at westerngeco.com    -./\.-   the opinion of Schlumberger or
http://petef.22web.net           -./\.-   WesternGeco.
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list