[LEAPSECS] Michael, brother of Jerry - a parable of timekeeping
Ashley Yakeley
ashley at semantic.org
Fri Oct 24 03:48:22 EDT 2008
One can, of course, acquire this confidence by setting one to the other.
-- Ashley
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 08:45 +0100, Peter Vince wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Two would give you SOME confidence if they read the same, and at least you would know to be wary if they didn't. With
> three, you can use a majority voting system, and that is what we do (although we are not at sea!)
>
> Peter Vince (London, England)
>
>
> On Fri Oct 24 5:31 , Rob Seaman <seaman at noao.edu> sent:
>
> > From Jack London, a question: "Why did you sail with only one
> >chronometer?"
> >
> > http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/25.41.html#subj10
> >
> >If two chronometers are "no better than one", why are three better
> >than two?
> >
> >Rob Seaman
> >National Optical Astronomy Observatory
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LEAPSECS mailing list
> LEAPSECS at leapsecond.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
>
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list