[LEAPSECS] Michael, brother of Jerry - a parable of timekeeping

Ashley Yakeley ashley at semantic.org
Fri Oct 24 03:48:22 EDT 2008


One can, of course, acquire this confidence by setting one to the other.

-- Ashley

On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 08:45 +0100, Peter Vince wrote:

> Hi Rob,

>

> Two would give you SOME confidence if they read the same, and at least you would know to be wary if they didn't. With

> three, you can use a majority voting system, and that is what we do (although we are not at sea!)

>

> Peter Vince (London, England)

>

>

> On Fri Oct 24 5:31 , Rob Seaman <seaman at noao.edu> sent:

>

> > From Jack London, a question: "Why did you sail with only one

> >chronometer?"

> >

> > http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/25.41.html#subj10

> >

> >If two chronometers are "no better than one", why are three better

> >than two?

> >

> >Rob Seaman

> >National Optical Astronomy Observatory

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> LEAPSECS mailing list

> LEAPSECS at leapsecond.com

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

>




More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list