[LEAPSECS] A new use for Pre-1972 UTC

[Rob Seaman]

The URL to the OASIS document didn't work for me, so it's hard to  
evaluate the reasoning behind the choice of format here.  What exactly  
is the use case they are trying to satisfy?  That said, I'm with  
Tony.  This seems like what ISO 8601 was designed for.  If not ISO  
8601, how about Julian day number to 5 or 6 decimal places?  Why do  
they need a count of elapsed seconds?  Requirements are good.   
Challenging them aggressively is better.

Rob
---

On Feb 17, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:


> In message <20090217.133212.-828392962.imp at bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner  

> Losh" writes

> :

>> In message: <F21E028C02794C7BB61111CBA28E2EB6 at grendel>

>>           "Gerard Ashton" <ashtongj at comcast.net> writes:

>> :    Concatenate the "epoch" time at the time this ID value is being

>> :    generated ; the "epoch" time is the number of seconds elapsed  

>> since

>> :    00:00:00 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) January 01,

>>

>> I think it would be better to define this in a different way.  It

>> should be defined more like:

>>

>>      ((year - 1970) * 365 + ((year - 1969) / 4) + day_of_year) *  

>> 86400 +

>>      hour * 3600 + min * 60 + sec

>

> It would have been even better to write:

>

> 	An ISO C "time_t" timestamp.

>

> Poul-Henning