[LEAPSECS] Marine chronometers, was Re: A new use for Pre-1972 UTC
Joseph M Gwinn
gwinn at raytheon.com
Wed Feb 18 15:44:19 EST 2009
leapsecs-bounces at leapsecond.com wrote on 02/18/2009 09:56:10 AM:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Joseph M Gwinn wrote:
> >
> > > The navigators who used marine chonometers knew perfectly well that
> > > those chronometers did not keep the "right" time as measured by
clocks
> > > on land being reset by telescopes. Instead they knew that if their
> > > chronmeters were treated well they kept uniform time, and those
> > > navigators knew that getting the "right" time meant keeping a log of
> > > the difference between the "right" time of the clocks on land and
> > > their chronometer.
> >
> > They used the best cronometers then available. Harrison's first
attempt
> > at a chronometer was in 1730, and success came many years later, in
1760
> > or so.
>
> Steve is right. The key difference between H4 and Harrison's previous
> clocks is that he gave up trying to make a clock that keeps correct time
> and instead designed a clock that kept uniform time, which he could
> calibrate before a journey. This is often not well explained inthe
potted
> histories.
I didn't trim enough when I quoted. I was reacting to the complaint about
navigation problems in 1707. I think you're right about the history of
Harrrison's clocks. It wasn't until 1730 that Harrison achieved
sufficient accuracy.
Joe
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list