[LEAPSECS] Automation
M. Warner Losh
imp at bsdimp.com
Thu Jan 1 17:11:13 EST 2009
In message: <1230843729.9555.2.camel at glastonbury>
Ashley Yakeley <ashley at semantic.org> writes:
: On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 09:41 -0700, Rob Seaman wrote:
: > They can't be naively automated. The schedule is currently
: > predictable 6 months in advance. Nobody has objected to a longer
: > schedule; we're positively giddy to give it a try. NTP is proof of
: > concept that automation is possible once the schedule is released.
:
: This might encourage software engineers to do the wrong thing, that is,
: hard-code a leap-second table.
But leap seconds are already hard coded, or at least there's a table
of them, on many systems that need to grok leap seconds. similar to
the timezone 'hard coding'.
Warner
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list