[LEAPSECS] [time-nuts] Leap Quirks
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Jan 5 11:15:00 EST 2009
In message <alpine.LSU.2.00.0901051603040.10002 at hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>, Tony F
inch writes:
>On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> The proper thing for the future is either a "int128_t" 64.64
>> fixedpoint time representation or a double ditto.
>
>Do you mean double as in the C type? Which is surely too small - you want
>quad-precision FP or perhaps "double double" (paired doubles to get 112
>bits of mantissa).
True, it would probably have to be a "long double" of at least 80 bits.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list