From sla at ucolick.org Sat Mar 7 14:01:52 2009 From: sla at ucolick.org (Steve Allen) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:01:52 -0800 Subject: [LEAPSECS] 25000 years, or my money back? Message-ID: <20090307190152.GA25985@ucolick.org> Another "atomic clock" advert; good for 1 second in 25000 years. http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/556476 If it fails by one second before then should I sue? Who? NIST? Control Company of Texas? How exactly does one get ISO 9001 certs that extend 25 millennia? Or maybe they just noted that the historical variations in the rate of what we now call TAI are just about that big. -- Steve Allen WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m From magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org Sat Mar 7 14:13:50 2009 From: magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org (Magnus Danielson) Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:13:50 +0100 Subject: [LEAPSECS] 25000 years, or my money back? In-Reply-To: <20090307190152.GA25985@ucolick.org> References: <20090307190152.GA25985@ucolick.org> Message-ID: <49B2C76E.2080208@rubidium.dyndns.org> Steve Allen skrev: > Another "atomic clock" advert; good for 1 second in 25000 years. > http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/556476 > > If it fails by one second before then should I sue? Who? > NIST? Control Company of Texas? > > How exactly does one get ISO 9001 certs that extend 25 millennia? > > Or maybe they just noted that the historical variations in the rate of > what we now call TAI are just about that big. I don't think they actually means that TDEV(25000y) + MTIE(25000y) < 1 s or that expected lifetime of the clocks, NIST transmission service or the user to be 25000 years either. It's all about some product people trying to make our incomprehensible jibberish understandable to the lay person while trying to say that this is a bargain deal. Scientific analysis usually breaks before you look at the title of such a thing. So in the end all you can do is to laugh at it and go about the usual buissness. I expect the LCD to fade long before 25000y for instance. Still, it can be a usefull clock for many not being time-nuts but just want a fair feel of time of day without reset hazzle and for about 10 years or so. Should fit the need to know when to run for the bus etc. Cheers, Magnus From mgy1912 at cox.net Sat Mar 7 15:56:28 2009 From: mgy1912 at cox.net (Brian Garrett) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:56:28 -0800 Subject: [LEAPSECS] 25000 years, or my money back? References: <20090307190152.GA25985@ucolick.org> Message-ID: <180C455F2E144CA6BD0BF25E2358AB86@company48fcb68> "Resolution is 1 second. Accuracy is 1/10,000 of a second." Funny, the radio signal travel time from Fort Collins to here was still about 7ms, last time I checked. Does this clock have warp drive too? :-) Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Allen" To: "Leap Second Discussion List" Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 11:01 AM Subject: [LEAPSECS] 25000 years, or my money back? > Another "atomic clock" advert; good for 1 second in 25000 years. > http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/556476 > > If it fails by one second before then should I sue? Who? > NIST? Control Company of Texas? > > How exactly does one get ISO 9001 certs that extend 25 millennia? > > Or maybe they just noted that the historical variations in the rate of > what we now call TAI are just about that big. > > -- > Steve Allen WGS-84 (GPS) > UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat > +36.99855 > University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 > Lng -122.06015 > Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m > _______________________________________________ > LEAPSECS mailing list > LEAPSECS at leapsecond.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1988 - Release Date: 03/06/09 19:17:00