[LEAPSECS] An example

[Warner Losh]

> But "somehow" is not what is on the table.  The astronomers in this forum have not been unwilling to consider alternate "somehows".  It is the ITU-R which is unwilling to debate the issues.

Please don't confuse Poul-Henning and myself for ITU-R apologists.  
We've presented a wide range of remedies as well.

> Perhaps it seems that we've been fending off Poul-Henning and Warner all this time.  Rather, they have been polite enough to engage in conversation.  Remove the artificial crisis from the table and this will prove to be a more productive exercise.

I think this group has a wide range of views.  There is a crisis, we'd 
all agree.  We disagree about the urgency and severity (and of course 
the solutions).

I don't have any connection to the ITU-R.  I just have implemented a 
leap-second understanding system (several of them) and have the scars 
from that to prove it.

Warner