[LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 45, Issue 3

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <3B33E89C51D2DE44BE2F0C757C656C8809437936 at mail02.stk.com>, "Finklema
n, Dave" writes:


>In other words, if UTC changes and is

>still called UTC, the new definition would be the statutory requirement.

>Every process and system developed for the previous definition would be

>illegal.


Unless of course, if the nature of the change was to make the presently
non-compliant, and therefore presumably illegal, systems compliant and
thus legal :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.