[LEAPSECS] "China move could call time on GMT"
Rob Seaman
seaman at noao.edu
Fri Dec 30 17:49:16 EST 2011
Umn, no. They are rather fuzzily suggesting that they can get away with an insipid shell game.
Time-of-day is and will remain an angle. That angle will be poorly approximated by a redefined secularly diverging UTC. There are plenty of options for improving the current approximation and/or infrastructure. Just imagine if the temporal powers-that-be had spent the last twelve years focusing on system engineering rather than politics.
Rob Seaman
National Optical Astronomy Observatory
--
On Dec 30, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <37559224-850D-49F1-9B57-2B89E107C53A at noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
>
>> As you say, there could be additional parameters of interest. The
>> ITU is proceeding with a naive (and expensive) agenda that cadence
>> is the same thing as angle.
>
> Uhm, no. They are quite clearly proposing that angle isn't time any more.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list