[LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 51, Issue 23
Gerard Ashton
ashtongj at comcast.net
Mon Feb 7 15:37:09 EST 2011
On 2/7/2011 2:49 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Finkleman, Dave wrote:
>
>> This discussion exposes the fact that we don't all have to work in the
>> same reference frame or time system - as long as we understand what we
>> are using and make it clear to users.
> Though the whole point of universal time is that it's the default timscale
> for civil use and only specialists should need anything else.
>
> Tony.
Many units are derived from the second. While I might be interested in
reporting
the time of day of an event in UTC, I will make virtually all other
measurements,
such as current, force, mass, and length, in units derived from the SI
second as
it exists in my reference frame. If I carry out a precision realization
of any of the
other units, the SI second in my reference frame will follow, even if I
don't have
an atomic clock.
Gerry Ashton
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list