[LEAPSECS] What's the point?
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Fri Feb 11 10:42:41 EST 2011
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Mark Calabretta wrote:
> On Thu 2011/02/10 10:43:40 -0000, Tony Finch wrote
> >
> >Also, the "quadratic catastrophe" argument is usually used in support of
> >UTC.
>
> Really? Can you provide references for that.
See for example
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/leapsecs/2011-January/002124.html
where Rob Seaman wrote "Civil timekeeping is cumulative. Tiny mistakes
posing the problem will result in large and growing permanent errors."
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR
ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list