[LEAPSECS] What's the point?
dot at dotat.at
Fri Feb 11 10:42:41 EST 2011
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Mark Calabretta wrote:
> On Thu 2011/02/10 10:43:40 -0000, Tony Finch wrote
> >Also, the "quadratic catastrophe" argument is usually used in support of
> Really? Can you provide references for that.
See for example
where Rob Seaman wrote "Civil timekeeping is cumulative. Tiny mistakes
posing the problem will result in large and growing permanent errors."
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR
ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.
More information about the LEAPSECS