[LEAPSECS] What's the point?

Tony Finch dot at dotat.at
Fri Feb 11 10:42:41 EST 2011


On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Mark Calabretta wrote:

> On Thu 2011/02/10 10:43:40 -0000, Tony Finch wrote

> >

> >Also, the "quadratic catastrophe" argument is usually used in support of

> >UTC.

>

> Really? Can you provide references for that.


See for example
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/leapsecs/2011-January/002124.html
where Rob Seaman wrote "Civil timekeeping is cumulative. Tiny mistakes
posing the problem will result in large and growing permanent errors."

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR
ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.


More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list