[LEAPSECS] What's the point?
Mark Calabretta
mcalabre at atnf.csiro.au
Sun Feb 13 19:29:02 EST 2011
On Fri 2011/02/11 15:33:01 -0000, "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote
in a message to: Leap Second Discussion List <leapsecs at leapsecond.com>
>I don't believe that's so. I might agree that people expect it to be within
>about 3 hours, but that's all.
Do people in western China work 9-to-5? If so, is it dark when they
get to work? Or do they work later hours? Are they happy about this
or do they just toe the party line?
>What's the problem with them moving on different dates? Um, beyond the
>problems we already have because they move on loads of different dates.
No intrinsic problem, just an extra level of chaos, made worse
possibly because it's a secular effect.
>> Currently the main chaotic element of timezones is concerned with
>> the start and end date of DST. The chaos is restricted to two
>> periods, sometime in autumn and spring, and it only amounts to one
>> hour to and fro.
>
>FX: laughter.
>
>As an example, last year Egypt had two separate sessions of DST.
How is this not be concerned with the "start and end date of DST"?
>> Leaping timezones, each "at their own pace", can only add an extra
>> level of chaos, one that will eventually lead to multi-hour offsets
>> that continue to grow over time.
>
>Why? Adjacent countries might move from a delta of an hour to zero and then
>back again, but why would one place move at a different *rate* (i.e. leaps
>per millenium) to another? In other words, how is this any more complex
>than Russia deciding not to end DST this year?
Not all countries/states/provinces implement daylight saving.
Anyway, the Australian provinces might stand their ground.
Regards,
Mark Calabretta
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list