[LEAPSECS] Crunching Bulletin B numbers (POSIX time)
dot at dotat.at
Mon Feb 21 08:37:32 EST 2011
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> Tony Finch said:
> > > There's no reason why you couldn't extend numeric tz offsites to include
> > > leapseconds, as in "Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:17:16 +000021".
> > Yes there is: timezone offsets are relative to UTC not TAI.
> That would be a matter of defining the new notation (offsets are currently
> sign plus 4 digits, after all).
Hence my earlier question: is there already a standard specifying this?
If not why not? Is it in fact trivial as Ian claimed?
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Trafalgar: Westerly or northwesterly 3 or 4, occasionally 5 or 6 in north.
Rough or very rough. Mainly fair. Good.
More information about the LEAPSECS