[LEAPSECS] Crunching Bulletin B numbers (POSIX time)
seaman at noao.edu
Mon Feb 21 15:46:44 EST 2011
On Feb 21, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> For one thing, please tell why you compare a regular mechanism that is predictable over centuries, to one which is irregular and only announced 6 months in advance.
Because it isn't just a comparison of the distinct deployed solutions, but of the similar underlying problems.
That said, note that one out of four years are leap-years (one leap-day out of 1461 days). Only one out of every five million seconds have been leap-seconds since this mechanism was introduced.
A six month prediction horizon means that each leap-seconds is known 1.5 million seconds in advance. By comparison, there have been 100 leap-days in about 150,000 days since Gregory's decree.
In short, leap-seconds are a thousand times more "regular" than leap-days.
By all means let's improve the scheduling even further, but the prior generation of timekeepers did a pretty damn good job with the mechanism we have.
More information about the LEAPSECS