[LEAPSECS] Looking-glass, through

[Sanjeev Gupta]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 13:47, Tom Van Baak <tvb at leapsecond.com> wrote:


> You really didn't expect 250 diffeent atomic clocks around

> the world to all agree at the ns level at all times did you?

>


<tounge-in-cheek>
Why not?  nano is 10E-9, and I see references to people trying for clocks
with 10E-12 on this list.

And what good is the "atom" part of an atomic clock, if it can't even handle
"nano"?
</foot-in-mouth>

Still waiting for the flying cars I was promised ...
-- 
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208     http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/leapsecs/attachments/20110114/4d57b43e/attachment.htm>