[LEAPSECS] No leapseconds on trains
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at davros.org
Thu Nov 17 06:59:12 EST 2011
Poul-Henning Kamp said:
>>> (Unix and ANSI-C format).
> Doing that, it is immediately obvious to even the causual observer,
> that the job of the parantheses is to settle any questions with
> respect to leapseconds by saying "Like UNIX, we don't have them".
But C does have them. Indeed, C90 allowed two in the same minute!
I agree with Paul; it's self-inconsistent.
--
Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: clive at davros.org | it will get its revenge.
Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer
Mobile: +44 7973 377646
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list