[LEAPSECS] telescope systems saw the leap second
Rob Seaman
seaman at noao.edu
Sun Jul 1 14:56:08 EDT 2012
On Jul 1, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> It means that Daniel Gambis wasn't even close to the mark when he told AP on friday:
>
> "There should be no noticeable affect or inconvenience on
> computers or any other technology that requires precise
> timekeeping because they adjust for these leap seconds"
Did he? The AP doesn't include those double quotes:
http://www.laramieboomerang.com/articles/2012/07/01/ap/science/us_sci_leap_second.txt
(I used to live in Laramie and find it amusing that the Boomerang - named after a mule - was the top hit to my query. A pointer to a more official posting of the AP story would be welcome.)
Was Daniel even interviewed in English? Is there an Agence France-Presse story? What was the context for whatever was said? Did a carefully neutral statement hedged with conditionals get trimmed down by a copy editor?
Like Steve says: "Can we make a list of what we know?"
Rob
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list