[LEAPSECS] Does the "leap second" matter?
Rob Seaman
seaman at noao.edu
Sat Aug 3 14:28:11 EDT 2013
On Aug 3, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Richard B. Langley <lang at unb.ca> wrote:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-23559189
Define "matter" ;-)
The exchange about circadian rhythms has a more recent calibration of 24.18 +/- 0.04 days:
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/07.15/bioclock24.html
We're apparently pretty good biochemical clocks.
Rob
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list