[LEAPSECS] drawing the battle lines
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Wed Mar 20 10:13:40 EDT 2013
In message <20130320134629.GA31763 at ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:
>Concluding the report is Resolution 6 in which the CCTF declares what
>UT1 is and is not, what UTC is, and what a time scale is in a fashion
>that directly contradicts the 1976 IAU definition of time scale.
Its not unreasonable to expect somebody with "Time" and "Frequency"
in their name had a better grasp of that, than somebody with
"Astronomy" in their name, is it ?
>In particular, resolution 6 makes it plain that the count of days in a
>calendar and the subdivision of those days is not a time scale if
>those days are measured by astronomical means.
Given that the SI second is based on quantum mechanics, that can hardly
surprise anybody.
>In short, that history, tradition, law, and common public perception
>about what time is have been wrong.
In other words: Just like Einstein proved Newtons mechanics wrong.
It's called "Scientific Progress".
You should try it.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list