[LEAPSECS] When did computer timekeeping get good enough for	leap seconds to matter?
    Poul-Henning Kamp 
    phk at phk.freebsd.dk
       
    Thu Jan  9 11:00:29 EST 2014
    
    
  
In message <20140109110353.35874406063 at ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>, Hal Mu
rray writes:
>The IBM 360 systems starting in 1964 used the power line frequency.  (A 
>location in low memory got bumped at 300 counts per second.  5 per cycle on 
>60 Hz and 6 per cycle on 50 Hz.)  I wonder how much the power timekeeping 
>wandered back then relative to today.
It used to be pretty good, because people used synchronous motors to drive
clocks so the power companies tried to keep the long-term frequency
correct.
In Denmark they usually lost a couple of seconds during the day and
gained them back during the night, similarly they lost half a minute
over winter and gained it back over summer.
After deregulation nobody gets paid to keep the long term frequency,
so mains is no good, actually down-right bad, for timekeeping anymore.
-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list