[LEAPSECS] presentations from AAS Future of Time sessions

[Rob Seaman]

On Jan 14, 2014, at 3:48 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:


> In message <20140114103334.GV21945 at fysh.org>, Zefram writes:

> 

>> It's dubious to say that they meant UTC if they weren't aware of

>> leap seconds.  As that's the defining feature of UTC [...]

> 

> No.

> 

> The defining feature of UTC is the bit they put in the name:  Coordinated.


There's also the other two parts of the name, Universal Time:

	"The terms Greenwich Civil Time (G.C.T.), Weltzeit (W.Z.) and Universal Time (U.T.)  indicate time computed from Greenwich mean midnight without ambiguity."  (http://iau.org/static/resolutions/IAU1928_French.pdf)

UTC is subclassed from UT.  Leap seconds are necessary for that to be true. Coordination is a specific characteristic, but UT is the general class.



> To everybody else but the scientists who tickled the atomic clocks,

> leap seconds was an academic detail of no consequence.


Technology, standards and protocols are often esoteric and ticklish in their details.  That does not imply they are of no consequence to non-academics.  Leap seconds are a means to an end.

It is a simple fact that "day" means "synodic day" on Earth and a couple of dozen other large terrestrial worlds in the solar system.  This ties UTC to Greenwich mean midnight.  A timescale that omits that connection should not be denoted Universal Time of any kind, coordinated or not.

Rob