[LEAPSECS] Common Calendar Time (CCT) -Brooks Harris
Zefram
zefram at fysh.org
Fri Jan 17 20:22:24 EST 2014
Brooks Harris wrote:
>Yes, I understand that. Perhaps using the word "origin" was careless.
>Maybe you can suggest a better term.
"proleptic". You may usefully add "with astronomical year numbering" to
make clear that zero and negative year numbers are valid. But really,
when you're defining a time scale, the calendar is irrelevant. It's a
separate concern that should be addressed separately.
>Of course the idea is that dates after 1972-01-01T00:00:00Z are
>"earth corrected" (Leap Seconds).
Are you implying that dates before are not? That wouldn't be a proleptic
UTC.
-zefram
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list