[LEAPSECS] presentations from AAS Future of Time sessions
Brooks Harris
brooks at edlmax.com
Sat Jan 18 04:41:35 EST 2014
On 2014-01-18 12:43 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> On 18/01/14 08:57, Brooks Harris wrote:
>> On 2014-01-17 11:15 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's face it, this lump of orbital debris we call our home planet is
>>> what we have as a reference and try to have common set of references.
>>> This is our "universe".
>>>
>>
>> The "universe" is a little larger than that for the astronomers. "Earth
>> time" would have made more sense.
>
> You are missing my point, the word "universe" have different meanings,
> and when originally used for UTC it was used to mean a coordinated
> time for that "lump of orbital debris" and not for the "Universe".
> Thus, using a particular interpretation of the word as an argument is
> not very fruitful. It is just not very suitable choice of words, at
> least in english.
>
>
Both terms, "universal" and "coordinated", are laden with historical
connotations.
If you somehow refine the description of UTC I think you'd better rename it.
-Brooks
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list