[LEAPSECS] final report of the UK leap seconds dialog
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Thu Feb 5 09:40:58 EST 2015
--------
In message <D0F8E82E.12357%kevin.birth at qc.cuny.edu>, Kevin Birth writes:
>That said, this is a problem with the policy of implementing the leap
>second at the prime meridian at midnight UTC, not a problem with the leap
>second itself.
That's a theoretically correct observation, but given that the
planet is round and mostly populated I have a hard time seeing any
other longitude offering significant relief from this problem.
If one takes a strictly democratic view on this, China gets to veto
quite a wide slab of longitudes, given that they have the timezone
with most people in it.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list