[LEAPSECS] Improvements since 2012
Harlan Stenn
stenn at ntp.org
Mon Jan 12 02:36:11 EST 2015
Steve Allen writes:
> On Sat 2015-01-10T22:53:14 -0800, Ask Bj=F8rn Hansen hath writ:
> > What's better about NTP and the NTP Pool since 2012?
>
> This is a question better answered by David Malone based on his
> long-term monitoring of the leap flags in the NTP pool, but ...
>
> At the end of 2012 July there were false leap second events from NTP
> pool servers which were inappropriately advertising that a leap was
> still pending. This happened again at the end of 2012 August. I
> don't know if those servers were upgraded to better versions of NTP or
> if they were simply excluded from the pool, but the false leap flags
> seem to be way down by now.
This is almost certainly not a problem with NTP. It is almost certainly
a problem with either a refclock (or a signal being fed to a refclock)
or folks having bad leapsecond data, or manually forcing a leap second
notice.
--
Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org>
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list